@@ -614,6 +614,61 @@ void VPBasicBlock::print(raw_ostream &O, const Twine
&Indent,
printSuccessors(O, Indent);
}
#endif
+static void cloneCFG(VPBlockBase *Entry,
+ DenseMap &Old2NewVPBlocks);
+
+static VPBlockBase *cloneVPB(VPBlockBase *BB) {
@@ -982,6 +1037,94 @@ void VPlan::updateDominatorTree(DominatorTree *DT,
BasicBlock *LoopHeaderBB,
assert(DT->verify(DominatorTree::VerificationLevel::Fast));
}
+static void remapOperands(VPBlockBase *Entry, VPBlockBase *NewEntry,
+ DenseMap &Old2Ne
https://github.com/Artem-B approved this pull request.
LGTM, as we can only handle a single GPU target during compilation.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79373
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org
jlebar wrote:
> This method of compilation is not like CUDA, so we can't target all the GPUs
> at the same time.
Can you clarify for me -- what are you compiling where it's impossible to
target multiple GPUs in the binary? I'm confused because Art is understanding
that it's not CUDA, but we
jhuber6 wrote:
> > This method of compilation is not like CUDA, so we can't target all the
> > GPUs at the same time.
>
> Can you clarify for me -- what are you compiling where it's impossible to
> target multiple GPUs in the binary? I'm confused because Art is understanding
> that it's not C
jlebar wrote:
I...think I understand.
Is the output of this compilation step a cubin, then?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79373
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-
jhuber6 wrote:
> I...think I understand.
>
> Is the output of this compilation step a cubin, then?
Yes, it will spit out a simple `cubin` instead of a fatbinary. The NVIDIA
toolchain is much worse about this stuff than the AMD one, but in general it
works. You can check with `-###` or whateve
jlebar wrote:
Got it, okay, thanks.
Since this change only applies to `--target=nvptx64-nvidia-cuda`, fine by me.
Thanks for putting up with our scrutiny. :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79373
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits
https://github.com/MaskRay updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79239
>From 3725fa4eac3d3d946289d7eb7213f3a1751a2770 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fangrui Song
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 17:58:07 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20in?=
=?UTF
MaskRay wrote:
"""
This branch is out-of-date with the base branch
Merge the latest changes from main into this branch.
This merge commit will be associated with ...
"""
Hmm. rebase + `spr diff` cannot fix it. I'll merge this manually.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79239
___
jhuber6 wrote:
> Got it, okay, thanks.
>
> Since this change only applies to `--target=nvptx64-nvidia-cuda`, fine by me.
> Thanks for putting up with our scrutiny. :)
No problem, I probably should've have been clearer in my commit messages.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79373
___
https://github.com/MaskRay closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79239
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/bulbazord created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79508
There are 3 ways to create an EventDataBytes object: (const char *),
(llvm::StringRef), and (const void *, size_t len). All of these cases can be
handled under `llvm::StringRef`. Additionally, this allows us t
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Alex Langford (bulbazord)
Changes
There are 3 ways to create an EventDataBytes object: (const char *),
(llvm::StringRef), and (const void *, size_t len). All of these cases can be
handled under `llvm::StringRef`. Additionally, this allows
https://github.com/jhuber6 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79373
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/shafik approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68485
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -491,17 +491,39 @@ void VPlanTransforms::removeDeadRecipes(VPlan &Plan) {
static VPValue *createScalarIVSteps(VPlan &Plan, const InductionDescriptor &ID,
ScalarEvolution &SE, Instruction *TruncI,
-Type
https://github.com/ayalz commented:
Some comments still seem relevant, trying to further clarify.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78113
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
@@ -491,17 +491,39 @@ void VPlanTransforms::removeDeadRecipes(VPlan &Plan) {
static VPValue *createScalarIVSteps(VPlan &Plan, const InductionDescriptor &ID,
ScalarEvolution &SE, Instruction *TruncI,
-Type
https://github.com/ayalz edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78113
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -491,19 +491,41 @@ void VPlanTransforms::removeDeadRecipes(VPlan &Plan) {
static VPValue *createScalarIVSteps(VPlan &Plan, const InductionDescriptor &ID,
ScalarEvolution &SE, Instruction *TruncI,
-Type
@@ -491,17 +491,39 @@ void VPlanTransforms::removeDeadRecipes(VPlan &Plan) {
static VPValue *createScalarIVSteps(VPlan &Plan, const InductionDescriptor &ID,
ScalarEvolution &SE, Instruction *TruncI,
-Type
https://github.com/fhahn updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78113
>From 36b085f21b76d7bf7c9965a86a09d1cef4fe9329 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Florian Hahn
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2024 14:13:08 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] [VPlan] Add new VPUniformPerUFRecipe, use for step
truncation.
https://github.com/ayalz edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73158
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -982,6 +1037,92 @@ void VPlan::updateDominatorTree(DominatorTree *DT,
BasicBlock *LoopHeaderBB,
assert(DT->verify(DominatorTree::VerificationLevel::Fast));
}
+static void remapOperands(VPBlockBase *Entry, VPBlockBase *NewEntry,
ayalz wrote:
Should `rema
@@ -982,6 +1037,92 @@ void VPlan::updateDominatorTree(DominatorTree *DT,
BasicBlock *LoopHeaderBB,
assert(DT->verify(DominatorTree::VerificationLevel::Fast));
}
+static void remapOperands(VPBlockBase *Entry, VPBlockBase *NewEntry,
+ DenseMap &Old2Ne
@@ -982,6 +1037,92 @@ void VPlan::updateDominatorTree(DominatorTree *DT,
BasicBlock *LoopHeaderBB,
assert(DT->verify(DominatorTree::VerificationLevel::Fast));
}
+static void remapOperands(VPBlockBase *Entry, VPBlockBase *NewEntry,
+ DenseMap &Old2Ne
@@ -982,6 +1037,92 @@ void VPlan::updateDominatorTree(DominatorTree *DT,
BasicBlock *LoopHeaderBB,
assert(DT->verify(DominatorTree::VerificationLevel::Fast));
}
+static void remapOperands(VPBlockBase *Entry, VPBlockBase *NewEntry,
+ DenseMap &Old2Ne
@@ -614,6 +614,61 @@ void VPBasicBlock::print(raw_ostream &O, const Twine
&Indent,
printSuccessors(O, Indent);
}
#endif
+static void cloneCFG(VPBlockBase *Entry,
+ DenseMap &Old2NewVPBlocks);
+
+static VPBlockBase *cloneVPB(VPBlockBase *BB) {
https://github.com/ayalz commented:
Few last minor comments.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73158
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -982,6 +1037,92 @@ void VPlan::updateDominatorTree(DominatorTree *DT,
BasicBlock *LoopHeaderBB,
assert(DT->verify(DominatorTree::VerificationLevel::Fast));
}
+static void remapOperands(VPBlockBase *Entry, VPBlockBase *NewEntry,
+ DenseMap &Old2Ne
https://github.com/fhahn edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78113
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -491,17 +491,39 @@ void VPlanTransforms::removeDeadRecipes(VPlan &Plan) {
static VPValue *createScalarIVSteps(VPlan &Plan, const InductionDescriptor &ID,
ScalarEvolution &SE, Instruction *TruncI,
-Type
@@ -491,17 +491,39 @@ void VPlanTransforms::removeDeadRecipes(VPlan &Plan) {
static VPValue *createScalarIVSteps(VPlan &Plan, const InductionDescriptor &ID,
ScalarEvolution &SE, Instruction *TruncI,
-Type
@@ -491,19 +491,41 @@ void VPlanTransforms::removeDeadRecipes(VPlan &Plan) {
static VPValue *createScalarIVSteps(VPlan &Plan, const InductionDescriptor &ID,
ScalarEvolution &SE, Instruction *TruncI,
-Type
https://github.com/fhahn commented:
Missed comments should be addressed now, seems I missed them in the GitHub UI
somehow
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78113
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/
@@ -491,19 +491,41 @@ void VPlanTransforms::removeDeadRecipes(VPlan &Plan) {
static VPValue *createScalarIVSteps(VPlan &Plan, const InductionDescriptor &ID,
ScalarEvolution &SE, Instruction *TruncI,
-Type
@@ -491,19 +491,41 @@ void VPlanTransforms::removeDeadRecipes(VPlan &Plan) {
static VPValue *createScalarIVSteps(VPlan &Plan, const InductionDescriptor &ID,
ScalarEvolution &SE, Instruction *TruncI,
-Type
@@ -491,17 +491,39 @@ void VPlanTransforms::removeDeadRecipes(VPlan &Plan) {
static VPValue *createScalarIVSteps(VPlan &Plan, const InductionDescriptor &ID,
ScalarEvolution &SE, Instruction *TruncI,
-Type
https://github.com/fhahn updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78113
>From 36b085f21b76d7bf7c9965a86a09d1cef4fe9329 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Florian Hahn
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2024 14:13:08 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] [VPlan] Add new VPUniformPerUFRecipe, use for step
truncation.
nga888 wrote:
Sorry for the delay to reply but I've been more busy of late. I can confirm
that it was a downstream code path which was calling `getFile()` for a
`SyntheticSection` that was causing the assertion. This downstream code was
effectively ignoring a
https://github.com/ayalz commented:
Missing an update of ResultTy, and possibly some test(s)?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78113
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb
https://github.com/ayalz edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78113
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -491,17 +491,38 @@ void VPlanTransforms::removeDeadRecipes(VPlan &Plan) {
static VPValue *createScalarIVSteps(VPlan &Plan, const InductionDescriptor &ID,
ScalarEvolution &SE, Instruction *TruncI,
-Type
https://github.com/bulbazord created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79517
`FindBreakpointID` take a BreakpointID and a pointer to a size_t (so you can
get position information). It returns a bool to indicate whether the id was
found in the list or not.
There are 2 callers of this c
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Alex Langford (bulbazord)
Changes
`FindBreakpointID` take a BreakpointID and a pointer to a size_t (so you can
get position information). It returns a bool to indicate whether the id was
found in the list or not.
There are 2 callers of th
https://github.com/jasonmolenda approved this pull request.
LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79517
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/aaupov edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76905
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/aaupov closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76905
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
jasonmolenda wrote:
@mordante I'm seeing failures on the macOS bots (and on my desktop) with
TestDataFormatterLibcxxChrono.py, the test
self.expect(
"frame variable ss_neg_date_time",
substrs=[
"ss_neg_date_time = date/time=-32767-01-01T00:00:00Z
https://github.com/rmarker updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78011
>From c4d28f82e108f9f12ccd0375e2a3502025b8c1e8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: rmarker
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 15:01:18 +1030
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang-format] Add ShortReturnTypeLength option.
---
clang/docs/C
Author: Jason Molenda
Date: 2024-01-25T16:30:14-08:00
New Revision: ba45ad160e3f329aeb02c19eaf18af27fa423d85
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ba45ad160e3f329aeb02c19eaf18af27fa423d85
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ba45ad160e3f329aeb02c19eaf18af27fa423d85.diff
jasonmolenda wrote:
I commented out the two tests that are failing on macOS temporarily so you'd
have a chance to look at this. If you don't have access to macOS (I assume
this is working on Linux or whatever), @Michael137 or I can look into it.
Thanks.
```
commit ba45ad160e3f329aeb02c19e
https://github.com/Lewuathe updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76316
>From a5810363e546da073543cb2d62cceb956c46b2e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kai Sasaki
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 15:53:54 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [mlir][complex] Prevent underflow in complex.abs
---
.../Comp
https://github.com/chelcassanova created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79533
This test is being added as a way to check the behaviour of how progress events
are broadcasted when reports are started and ended with the current
implementation of progress reports. Here we're mainly che
https://github.com/dcaballe updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79494
>From b8fb65dd1e65c36cfb2104e5f35179faa6011552 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Diego Caballero
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 02:39:14 +
Subject: [PATCH] [mlir][Vector] Add patterns for efficient i4 -> i8 conversion
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Chelsea Cassanova (chelcassanova)
Changes
This test is being added as a way to check the behaviour of how progress events
are broadcasted when reports are started and ended with the current
implementation of progress reports. Here we're ma
https://github.com/ZijunZhaoCCK updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78655
>From f440f44e7e270d4636ad39f4e4223c904e496d3a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: zijunzhao
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 00:47:05 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Make clang report invalid target versions for all
environme
https://github.com/ZijunZhaoCCK updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78655
>From f440f44e7e270d4636ad39f4e4223c904e496d3a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: zijunzhao
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 00:47:05 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] Make clang report invalid target versions for all
environme
https://github.com/adk9 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75960
>From a43ef7289cd7f5353fc4b365566011b93879e8f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Abhishek Kulkarni
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 10:50:26 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Fix generation of python bindings for async dialect
---
.../mli
https://github.com/adk9 edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75960
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/adk9 edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75960
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/SuperSodaSea updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68485
>From 03276260c48d9cafb2a0d80825156e77cdf02eba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: SuperSodaSea
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2023 21:05:17 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 01/15] [clang] static operators should evaluate object
argumen
https://github.com/rmarker updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78011
>From c4d28f82e108f9f12ccd0375e2a3502025b8c1e8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: rmarker
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 15:01:18 +1030
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang-format] Add ShortReturnTypeLength option.
---
clang/docs/C
https://github.com/SuperSodaSea updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68485
>From 03276260c48d9cafb2a0d80825156e77cdf02eba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: SuperSodaSea
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2023 21:05:17 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 01/15] [clang] static operators should evaluate object
argumen
https://github.com/Zingam updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79032
>From e03452fda84a5284420bba1913299b68caabb6cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zingam
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 20:35:00 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "Revert "[libc++][format] P2637R3: Member `visit`
(`std::basi
https://github.com/H-G-Hristov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79032
>From e03452fda84a5284420bba1913299b68caabb6cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zingam
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 20:35:00 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Revert "Revert "[libc++][format] P2637R3: Member `visit`
(`std:
https://github.com/H-G-Hristov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79032
>From e03452fda84a5284420bba1913299b68caabb6cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zingam
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 20:35:00 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Revert "Revert "[libc++][format] P2637R3: Member `visit`
(`std:
https://github.com/H-G-Hristov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79032
>From e03452fda84a5284420bba1913299b68caabb6cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zingam
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 20:35:00 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] Revert "Revert "[libc++][format] P2637R3: Member `visit`
(`std:
https://github.com/H-G-Hristov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79032
>From e03452fda84a5284420bba1913299b68caabb6cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zingam
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 20:35:00 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] Revert "Revert "[libc++][format] P2637R3: Member `visit`
(`std:
https://github.com/H-G-Hristov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79032
>From e03452fda84a5284420bba1913299b68caabb6cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zingam
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 20:35:00 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] Revert "Revert "[libc++][format] P2637R3: Member `visit`
(`std:
https://github.com/SuperSodaSea updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68485
>From 03276260c48d9cafb2a0d80825156e77cdf02eba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: SuperSodaSea
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2023 21:05:17 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 01/15] [clang] static operators should evaluate object
argumen
https://github.com/Lewuathe updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76316
>From a5810363e546da073543cb2d62cceb956c46b2e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kai Sasaki
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 15:53:54 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [mlir][complex] Prevent underflow in complex.abs
---
.../Comp
101 - 173 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
