Sorry, I forgot about the xcode project changes. I could have reverted
those as well.
pl
On 25 October 2016 at 22:49, Tim Hammerquist wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
> Looks like some code left after this revert is still expecting this file
> (added contemporary to r284828) that was removed in this revisio
Author: labath
Date: Wed Oct 26 06:13:56 2016
New Revision: 285187
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=285187&view=rev
Log:
Don't set a software stepping breakpoint at 0 on arm or mips.
Summary:
Check whether the setting the breakpoint failed during instruction emulation. If
it did, the
labath accepted this revision.
labath added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Thanks. I've committed this as r285187.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D25926
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.ll
For people who have a Mac and can make changes to the project files, we
consider it polite and kind that they also fix up the project file when they
add or remove source files. But we also realize it isn't reasonable to require
that somebody working on Linux, Windows, etc. have access to a Mac
Author: enrico
Date: Wed Oct 26 13:12:52 2016
New Revision: 285216
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=285216&view=rev
Log:
Actually use = delete to mark constructors and operators we want to not exist.
Just declaring them as private works, but it can confuse certain tools as it
doesn't
Author: enrico
Date: Wed Oct 26 14:17:49 2016
New Revision: 285226
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=285226&view=rev
Log:
Fix an issue where frame variable -s would not show the scope even
though the user asked for it
Part of rdar://28434047
Added:
lldb/trunk/packages/Python/ll
jasonmolenda updated this revision to Diff 75977.
jasonmolenda added a comment.
I believe this rewrite of the original patch addresses Tamas' feedback (thanks
Tamas!) I dropped a lot of the changes in the original; I switch
EmulateInstructionARM64 from using DWARF register numbering to use LLDB
