>
> It looks like nobody except me is worried about the
> module-without-an-object-file situation, so I guess we can try this out and
> see how it goes.
>
Sorry Pavel, I meant to respond to this: most of the code seems to
explicitly handle this case (module-without-object-file), I just had to fix
Greg/Pavel, does the latest revision look good to you? Thanks!
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:31 AM, Leonard Mosescu via Phabricator <
revi...@reviews.llvm.org> wrote:
> lemo marked an inline comment as done.
> lemo added a comment.
>
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D45700#1070491, @amccarth wrote:
>
>
