https://github.com/labath closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97400
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/jimingham approved this pull request.
LGTM, non-recursive mutex's are much easier to reason about for sure. Thanks
for the unit test!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97400
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Pavel Labath (labath)
Changes
Non-recursive mutexes encourage better locking discipline and avoid bugs like
#96750, where one can unexpectedly re-enter the critical section on the
same thread, and interrupt a presumed-indivisible operation
https://github.com/labath created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97400
Non-recursive mutexes encourage better locking discipline and avoid bugs like
#96750, where one can unexpectedly re-enter the critical section on the same
thread, and interrupt a presumed-indivisible operation.
