https://github.com/labath approved this pull request.
Yes, that looks about right, though it's unfortunate that this does not have
any test case. I would really recommend you figure out a testing strategy for
this -- for your benefit (less chance of other changes breaking this use case)
if no
GeorgeHuyubo wrote:
> > Updated the commit to address @labath's comment.
>
> Can you explain how you did that? The new implementation does something
> completely different (and wrong on several levels) from the one I pointed you
> to.
> [Here](https://android.googlesource.com/platform/bionic/
https://github.com/GeorgeHuyubo updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120655
>From 896ec79db0b59f9a98fcfd06f6e3a5c7f2946a87 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: George Hu
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 15:38:12 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb] Fix address to read segment data
---
lldb/source/Plugi
labath wrote:
> Updated the commit to address @labath's comment.
Can you explain how you did that? The new implementation does something
completely different (and wrong on several levels) from the one I pointed you
to.
[Here](https://android.googlesource.com/platform/bionic/+/android-4.2_r1/l
GeorgeHuyubo wrote:
Updated the commit to address @labath's comment.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120655
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/GeorgeHuyubo updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120655
>From 72d214dc2e6d9754ae5525a9161924f140d92e3c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: George Hu
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 15:38:12 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb] Fix address to read segment data
---
lldb/source/Plugi
https://github.com/GeorgeHuyubo edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120655
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/labath commented:
I'm pretty sure this is not correct. `p_offset` is an offset in the file. It
tells you nothing about how the file is mapped into memory.
What you're *probably* running into is an executable whose base address
(`p_vaddr` of the first `PT_LOAD` segment) is no
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: None (GeorgeHuyubo)
Changes
Previous commit
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/bcf654c7f5fb84dd7cff5fe112d96658853cd8f5
introduced a bug which makes lldb unable to parse gnu build id for the main
executable from a core file.
This
https://github.com/GeorgeHuyubo created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120655
Previous commit
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/bcf654c7f5fb84dd7cff5fe112d96658853cd8f5
introduced a bug which makes lldb unable to parse gnu build id for the main
executable from a core file.
10 matches
Mail list logo