https://github.com/ZequanWu closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91343
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/clayborg approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91343
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/bulbazord approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91343
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/JDevlieghere approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91343
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/ZequanWu edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91343
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
ZequanWu wrote:
> > For example:
> > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/lldb/source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/SymbolFileDWARF.cpp#L922-L927.
> > When parsing function info, it validates low and hi address of the
> > function: `GetMinRangeBase` returns the first range entry base and
bulbazord wrote:
> For example:
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/lldb/source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/SymbolFileDWARF.cpp#L922-L927.
> When parsing function info, it validates low and hi address of the function:
> `GetMinRangeBase` returns the first range entry base and `GetMax
ZequanWu wrote:
> > Some places assume the ranges are already sorted but it's not. This fixes
> > it.
>
> What places assumed it was sorted? I assume this means there are some bugs
> that this fixes? Can you give some more details about how you came to write
> this patch?
For example:
https
bulbazord wrote:
> Some places assume the ranges are already sorted but it's not. This fixes it.
What places assumed it was sorted? I assume this means there are some bugs that
this fixes? Can you give some more details about how you came to write this
patch?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-proj
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Zequan Wu (ZequanWu)
Changes
Dwarf 5 says "There is no requirement that the entries be ordered in any
particular way" in 2.17.3 Non-Contiguous Address Ranges for rnglist. Some
places assume the ranges are already sorted but it's not. This
https://github.com/ZequanWu created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91343
Dwarf 5 says "There is no requirement that the entries be ordered in any
particular way" in 2.17.3 Non-Contiguous Address Ranges for rnglist. Some
places assume the ranges are already sorted but it's not. This
11 matches
Mail list logo