hhb requested changes to this revision.
hhb added a comment.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
Can you sync to the latest code and try again? Your problem is likely to be
fixed in a previous change...
Repository:
rLLDB LLDB
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D6
labath added a reviewer: hhb.
labath added a subscriber: hhb.
labath added a comment.
As @mgorny said, I'm afraid the solution is not going to be as simple as
attaching LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX to the lib path. There is some ongoing work to
refactor/fix the way python paths are handled, but unfortunat
llunak updated this revision to Diff 224739.
llunak edited the summary of this revision.
llunak added a comment.
Updated misleading description.
Repository:
rLLDB LLDB
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68910/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68910
Files:
lldb/scripts/CMak
mgorny requested changes to this revision.
mgorny added a comment.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
No, it isn't. Some distros patch some Python versions for that but it's not a
rule.
Repository:
rLLDB LLDB
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68910/new/
https
llunak created this revision.
llunak added reviewers: clayborg, labath.
llunak added a project: LLDB.
Herald added subscribers: lldb-commits, JDevlieghere, mgorny.
On 64bit linux python is in lib64/python.
Repository:
rLLDB LLDB
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68910
Files:
lldb/scripts/CMakeList
