[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D55835: [dotest] Consider unexpected passes as failures.

2018-12-20 Thread Jonas Devlieghere via Phabricator via lldb-commits
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit rL349818: [dotest] Consider unexpected passes as failures. (authored by JDevlieghere, committed by ). Herald added a subscriber: llvm-commits. Changed prior to commit: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55835?vs=1

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D55835: [dotest] Consider unexpected passes as failures.

2018-12-20 Thread Pavel Labath via Phabricator via lldb-commits
labath accepted this revision. labath added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. Looks good to me. Modifying this code is not ideal, but this is a pretty small but fundamental change in how unittest works. Changing the treatment of unexpected successes anywhere else would

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D55835: [dotest] Consider unexpected passes as failures.

2018-12-18 Thread Jonas Devlieghere via Phabricator via lldb-commits
JDevlieghere created this revision. JDevlieghere added reviewers: labath, davide, jingham, clayborg. JDevlieghere added a project: LLDB. Unexpected successes should be considered failures because they can hide regressions when not addressed. When a test is fixed and not re-enabled, it can easily