[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D47495: [FileSpec] Re-implmenet removeLastPathComponent

2018-05-30 Thread Jonas Devlieghere via Phabricator via lldb-commits
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit rL333540: [FileSpec] Re-implmenet removeLastPathComponent (authored by JDevlieghere, committed by ). Herald added a subscriber: llvm-commits. Changed prior to commit: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47495?vs=14

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D47495: [FileSpec] Re-implmenet removeLastPathComponent

2018-05-30 Thread Pavel Labath via Phabricator via lldb-commits
labath accepted this revision. labath added inline comments. Comment at: unittests/Utility/FileSpecTest.cpp:342 + EXPECT_FALSE(fs_posix_relative.RemoveLastPathComponent()); + EXPECT_STREQ("foo", fs_posix_relative.GetCString()); + JDevlieghere wrote: > labath wr

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D47495: [FileSpec] Re-implmenet removeLastPathComponent

2018-05-30 Thread Jonas Devlieghere via Phabricator via lldb-commits
JDevlieghere added inline comments. Comment at: unittests/Utility/FileSpecTest.cpp:342 + EXPECT_FALSE(fs_posix_relative.RemoveLastPathComponent()); + EXPECT_STREQ("foo", fs_posix_relative.GetCString()); + labath wrote: > Is this the behavior you want here? I wa

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D47495: [FileSpec] Re-implmenet removeLastPathComponent

2018-05-30 Thread Pavel Labath via Phabricator via lldb-commits
labath added inline comments. Comment at: unittests/Utility/FileSpecTest.cpp:342 + EXPECT_FALSE(fs_posix_relative.RemoveLastPathComponent()); + EXPECT_STREQ("foo", fs_posix_relative.GetCString()); + Is this the behavior you want here? I was thinking we could fo