stella.stamenova abandoned this revision.
stella.stamenova added a comment.
I spent a bit of time trying to investigate the failures, but I couldn't make
much progress and I don't have time to dedicate to a more thorough
investigation. It looks like there are a few tests that outright fail
(inc
labath added a comment.
TBH, I am not really surprised by that. My recollection was that windows
lldb-server was still missing some features to be a viable replacement, but I
was hoping that I have recalled incorrectly.
It'd definitely be interesting to see what the missing pieces are.
Reposi
stella.stamenova added a comment.
So, sadly, I am going to have to backtrack here. When I set
`LLDB_USE_LLDB_SERVER` in my environment and ran the tests, they did appear to
be more stable (fewer failures across 10 test runs), but it was all a joke my
machine was playing on me.
Running the test
labath accepted this revision.
labath added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
ship it
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D117581/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D117581
stella.stamenova created this revision.
stella.stamenova added reviewers: JDevlieghere, clayborg, labath.
stella.stamenova requested review of this revision.
Herald added a project: LLDB.
Herald added a subscriber: lldb-commits.
The current default is to not use lldb-server on Windows, however, ll
