[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D75418: tab completion for process signal

MrHate updated this revision to Diff 248784. MrHate added a comment. Added a test case where test "process signal" without a running process. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D75418/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D75418 Files: lldb/source/Commands/CommandObjectProcess.cpp

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D75418: tab completion for process signal

MrHate updated this revision to Diff 248088. MrHate edited the summary of this revision. MrHate added a comment. Removed individual execution context updating. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D75418/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D75418 Files: lldb/source/Commands/Command

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D75418: tab completion for process signal

MrHate updated this revision to Diff 247786. MrHate added a comment. removed unnecessary assignment in test CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D75418/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D75418 Files: lldb/source/Commands/CommandObjectProcess.cpp lldb/test/API/functionalities/co

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D75418: tab completion for process signal

MrHate updated this revision to Diff 247785. MrHate added a comment. Update the current execution context, then get signals from the current process. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D75418/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D75418 Files: lldb/source/Commands/CommandObjectProc

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D75418: tab completion for process signal

MrHate added a comment. Thanks for pointing out my misunderstanding on the Unix signals, and fetching the list of valid signals from backend is always a better way indeed. However, getting the current process from the current context `m_exe_ctx` which is got from `m_interpreter` will cause an is