https://github.com/zyn0217 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136078
None
>From e70b8283d7778568ff715f8cc400732ad92ac321 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 11:45:52 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "[CI] monolithic-linux improvements (#135499)"
This
https://github.com/zyn0217 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136077
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
zyn0217 wrote:
> See for example CXXRecordDecl's getLambdaContextDecl function.
> Unfortunately there is an issue where we currently only store this lambda
> context when we need it for mangling reasons, …
Yeah, I remember we use that to store an ImplicitConceptSpecializationDecl as
well, not
zyn0217 wrote:
> or if we would implement a `TypeAliasTemplateSpecializationDecl` only for the
> benefit of external resugarers.
It is not only valuable to external resugarers. Another point that warrants an
introduction of it is for unevaluated lambdas. These lambdas e.g. appearing as
part o
https://github.com/zyn0217 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91132
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
zyn0217 wrote:
This had been fixed by 41574f5a6. Thanks @dwblaikie!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91132
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
zyn0217 wrote:
@aganea Feel free to commit this PR yourself if this works - It's midnight and
I'm not going to sit here. Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91132
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.ll
https://github.com/zyn0217 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91132
The fix per se seems trivial (given the nature of the new built-in type), and
hence I don't think we need extra tests.
>From e28f8b007e86d10c3649f8e4635c9bb52627302b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
zyn0217 wrote:
I plan to backport this patch and #79698 to clang 18 a few days later to see if
we're actually not breaking anything.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79985
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://list
@@ -651,16 +651,12 @@ class InlayHintVisitor : public
RecursiveASTVisitor {
// implied object argument ([over.call.func]), the list of provided
// arguments is preceded by the implied object argument for the purposes of
// this correspondence...
-//
-// How
@@ -651,16 +651,12 @@ class InlayHintVisitor : public
RecursiveASTVisitor {
// implied object argument ([over.call.func]), the list of provided
// arguments is preceded by the implied object argument for the purposes of
// this correspondence...
-//
-// How
https://github.com/zyn0217 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80108
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 approved this pull request.
Thanks again for working on it. The clangd part LGTM, and since the other part
was left as-is and had been accepted in our previous attempt #68485, I believe
we can now reland the patch.
Please keep an eye on the CI in case we have missed
@@ -15097,15 +15102,9 @@ ExprResult
Sema::CreateOverloadedArraySubscriptExpr(SourceLocation LLoc,
ExprValueKind VK = Expr::getValueKindForType(ResultTy);
ResultTy = ResultTy.getNonLValueExprType(Context);
-CallExpr *TheCall;
-if (Method->isInst
https://github.com/zyn0217 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79985
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -15097,15 +15102,9 @@ ExprResult
Sema::CreateOverloadedArraySubscriptExpr(SourceLocation LLoc,
ExprValueKind VK = Expr::getValueKindForType(ResultTy);
ResultTy = ResultTy.getNonLValueExprType(Context);
-CallExpr *TheCall;
-if (Method->isInst
@@ -15097,15 +15102,9 @@ ExprResult
Sema::CreateOverloadedArraySubscriptExpr(SourceLocation LLoc,
ExprValueKind VK = Expr::getValueKindForType(ResultTy);
ResultTy = ResultTy.getNonLValueExprType(Context);
-CallExpr *TheCall;
-if (Method->isInst
https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79985
>From 7ee1874af426d7879d218c6b8852fca0a87b1836 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 18:49:08 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [concepts] Push a CurContext before substituting into
out-of-line
https://github.com/zyn0217 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79698
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79985
>From 7ee1874af426d7879d218c6b8852fca0a87b1836 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 18:49:08 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [concepts] Push a CurContext before substituting into
out-of-line
zyn0217 wrote:
I'll try the CI again before landing it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79698
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79698
>From 39f64e6fa02392415f0e2776166d4451346e7e81 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2024 01:17:32 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [concepts] Set up an instantiation scope for constraint
expressio
22 matches
Mail list logo