tom.tromey added a comment.
> Apart from just implementing type system itself (which is much bigger scope
> than this change) there are other non-trivial issues:
>
> 1. There is no "compiler-as-a-service" in Rust so getting expressions to work
> is non-trivial. An interpreter of some sort needs
tromey added a comment.
I don't have write access so someone will have to land this for me. Thanks.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D47481
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commit
tromey added a comment.
I don't have commit access, so could someone please land this for me?
https://reviews.llvm.org/D46885
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
tromey added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D44752#1052027, @clayborg wrote:
> Can you add this to the patch for the rust plug-in then?
Yes, I already did; I just thought that since it was a latent bug in upstream
that I would submit it separately.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D44752
tromey added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D44907#1051931, @davide wrote:
> @tromey thanks! do you need somebody to commit this for you?
Yes. I do not have commit access.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D44907
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lld
tromey added a comment.
I only found this because I tried to use it in my rust plugin. So, I would
rather implement it, because if I removed it, I would have to find a new way to
do this.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D44752
___
lldb-commits mailing l
tromey added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D44693#1046925, @davide wrote:
> LGTM, thanks. Do you have commit access or you need somebody to commit this
> on your behalf?
I do not have commit access.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D44693
___
l
tromey updated this revision to Diff 139616.
tromey added a comment.
Add unit test
https://reviews.llvm.org/D44693
Files:
source/Core/Scalar.cpp
unittests/Core/ScalarTest.cpp
Index: unittests/Core/ScalarTest.cpp
===
--- unitt
tromey added a comment.
I've also noticed that int->float conversion in Scalar seems incorrect. At
least, Scalar.h claims that Scalar follows C promotion rules, but int->float
conversion is done using bitwise reinterpretation rather than preserving the
value. I have a patch for this, but I do