[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D150291: [Clang] Rename internal type identifier(s) for __bf16 to BF16Ty

2023-05-12 Thread Tom Honermann via Phabricator via lldb-commits
tahonermann requested changes to this revision. tahonermann added a comment. This revision now requires changes to proceed. > I do wonder if we need two bfloat implementations, but for that I'll leave a > comment on D149573 . Given the discussions occurring in D

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D150291: [Clang] Rename internal type identifier(s) for __bf16 to BF16Ty

2023-05-11 Thread Tom Honermann via Phabricator via lldb-commits
tahonermann accepted this revision. tahonermann added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. Thanks for all the updates @codemzs! I'm going to go ahead and accept. But please wait a few days for recently subscribed folks to have a chance to comment before landing this. Rep

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D150291: [Clang] Rename internal type identifier(s) for __bf16 to BF16Ty

2023-05-11 Thread Tom Honermann via Phabricator via lldb-commits
tahonermann added a subscriber: clang-vendors. tahonermann added a comment. Heads up @clang-vendors. This patch changes the names of many internal identifiers for enumerators, class data members, and functions (including virtual functions) that are related to support for the `__bf16` type. The

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D150291: [Clang] Rename internal type identifier(s) for __bf16 to BF16Ty

2023-05-11 Thread Tom Honermann via Phabricator via lldb-commits
tahonermann added subscribers: lenary, foad. tahonermann added a comment. > I was following the LLVM contribution guidelines to use git clang-format, but > I understand the importance of maintaining existing code styles that may be > altered by git-clang format. The guidelines are slightly in c

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D150291: [Clang] Rename internal type identifier(s) for `__bf16` to `BF16Ty`

2023-05-10 Thread Tom Honermann via Phabricator via lldb-commits
tahonermann requested changes to this revision. tahonermann added a comment. This revision now requires changes to proceed. This looks great, thank you for doing this! Requested changes are just to undo some of the style changes. Comment at: clang/include/clang/Basic/Specifier

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D146412: [NFC] Fix potential for use-after-free in DumpModuleInfoAction

2023-03-29 Thread Tom Honermann via Phabricator via lldb-commits
tahonermann accepted this revision. tahonermann added a comment. Thank you, Mariya! Looks good to me! Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D146412/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D146412 ___ lldb-c

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D146412: [NFC] Fix potential for use-after-free in DumpModuleInfoAction

2023-03-29 Thread Tom Honermann via Phabricator via lldb-commits
tahonermann added inline comments. Comment at: lldb/source/Commands/CommandObjectTarget.cpp:2182-2183 -clang::DumpModuleInfoAction dump_module_info; -dump_module_info.OutputStream = &result.GetOutputStream().AsRawOstream(); +std::shared_ptr Out( +&result.Get