[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r297626 - Delete dead code. NFC

2017-03-13 Thread Jonathan Roelofs via lldb-commits
Author: jroelofs Date: Mon Mar 13 10:25:01 2017 New Revision: 297626 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=297626&view=rev Log: Delete dead code. NFC Also has the side-effect of fixing the build on systems with glibc < 2.12 https://reviews.llvm.org/D30844 Modified: lldb/trunk/include

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D22463: [RFC] Moving to GitHub Proposal: NOT DECISION!

2016-07-19 Thread Jonathan Roelofs via lldb-commits
On 7/19/16 8:55 AM, Robinson, Paul wrote: I think we could emulate any pre-commit hook we like via GitHub WebHooks by having two repositories: llvm and llvm-staging (say). People push to llvm-staging, which notifies some LLVM server we own. That does basic sanity checks and pushes to llvm prop

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D22463: [RFC] Moving to GitHub Proposal: NOT DECISION!

2016-07-18 Thread Jonathan Roelofs via lldb-commits
jroelofs added a subscriber: jroelofs. Comment at: docs/Proposals/GitHub.rst:127 @@ +126,3 @@ +* The projects' repositories will remain identical, with a new address (GitHub). +* They'll continue to have SVN RW access, but will also gain Git RW access. +* The linear history can s

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D22463: [RFC] Moving to GitHub Proposal: NOT DECISION!

2016-07-18 Thread Jonathan Roelofs via lldb-commits
jroelofs added inline comments. Comment at: docs/Proposals/GitHub.rst:127 @@ +126,3 @@ +* The projects' repositories will remain identical, with a new address (GitHub). +* They'll continue to have SVN RW access, but will also gain Git RW access. +* The linear history can still be