https://github.com/dsandersllvm closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150732
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
dsandersllvm wrote:
That makes sense, I've added the command and switched to register read to avoid
the expression evaluator
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150732
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.
https://github.com/dsandersllvm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150732
>From bd27929645928939f319dc915da1a4636e4d317d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Sanders
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 19:02:21 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [lldb] Implement DW_CFA_val_offset and
DW_CFA_val_off
https://github.com/dsandersllvm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150732
>From bd27929645928939f319dc915da1a4636e4d317d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Sanders
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 19:02:21 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [lldb] Implement DW_CFA_val_offset and
DW_CFA_val_off
dsandersllvm wrote:
I've added a test case to confirm it is read correctly computing the value. As
I pushed it, it occurred to me that I should make the offset non-zero so I'll
fix that quick.
I don't think the non-standard return pointer bit from
eh-frame-dwarf-unwind.test should be necessar
https://github.com/dsandersllvm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150732
>From bd27929645928939f319dc915da1a4636e4d317d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Sanders
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 19:02:21 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [lldb] Implement DW_CFA_val_offset and
DW_CFA_val_off
dsandersllvm wrote:
I don't think combining them in ConcreteRegisterLocation completely makes sense
like it did for AbstractRegisterLocation because there's a difference in
semantics. eRegisterInRegister refers to a storage location whereas
eRegisterIsRegisterPlusOffset is a computed value wit
https://github.com/dsandersllvm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150732
>From bd27929645928939f319dc915da1a4636e4d317d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Sanders
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 19:02:21 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [lldb] Implement DW_CFA_val_offset and
DW_CFA_val_off
dsandersllvm wrote:
While looking into that, I found a couple mistakes that made me question how it
managed to work and I found that that bit is not actually used.
ConcreteRegisterLocation uses eRegisterIsRegisterPlusOffset for all
reg+offset's including reg=CFA, but AbstractRegisterLocation h
https://github.com/dsandersllvm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150732
>From bd27929645928939f319dc915da1a4636e4d317d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Sanders
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 19:02:21 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [lldb] Implement DW_CFA_val_offset and
DW_CFA_val_off
https://github.com/dsandersllvm created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150732
The test for this is artificial as I'm not aware of any upstream targets that
use DW_CFA_val_offset
RegisterContextUnwind::ReadFrameAddress now reports how it's attempting to
obtain the CFA unless all suc
dsanders added a comment.
> The route cause of your problem is that ReadRegisterUnsigned returns a value
> where the 32 MSB is garbage while the
> expected behavior is to zero out those bits (it works on i386 and arm
> AFAIK). You should find out why that is happening
> and fix the root caus
Author: dsanders
Date: Tue Sep 22 04:08:44 2015
New Revision: 248251
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=248251&view=rev
Log:
[lldb-mi] Fix unresolved reference to llvm_regcomp and llvm_regfree.
Subscribers: krytarowski, labath, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.or
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL248251: [lldb-mi] Fix unresolved reference to llvm_regcomp
and llvm_regfree. (authored by dsanders).
Changed prior to commit:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D13027?vs=35278&id=35351#toc
Repository:
rL LLVM
dsanders added a comment.
It seems I spoke too soon when I said the link error went away after a clean
build. This patch fixes it.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D13027
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bi
dsanders created this revision.
dsanders added subscribers: lldb-commits, labath, krytarowski.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D13027
Files:
tools/lldb-mi/CMakeLists.txt
Index: tools/lldb-mi/CMakeLists.txt
===
--- tools/lldb-mi/CMakeLists
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL248177: [lldb-server] No need to add pthread twice.
(authored by dsanders).
Changed prior to commit:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12964?vs=35086&id=35277#toc
Repository:
rL LLVM
http://reviews.llvm.org/
Author: dsanders
Date: Mon Sep 21 12:23:22 2015
New Revision: 248177
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=248177&view=rev
Log:
[lldb-server] No need to add pthread twice.
Summary:
Following on from r247991:
pthread is in LLDB_SYSTEM_LIBS so there's no need to explicitly add it to the
lin
dsanders added a comment.
'ninja clean' seems to have made the lldb-mi link failure go away. Presumably
something didn't rebuild when the references to llvm_regcomp and llvm_regfree
were added.
I'll run the lldb tests and then commit this.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12964
___
dsanders added a comment.
Thanks. I've acquired a new link failure (this time on lldb-mi) since my last
build so I'll commit this once I have a temporary fix in place for that and can
run the tests again.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12964
___
lldb-co
dsanders updated this revision to Diff 35086.
dsanders added a comment.
Correct the patch. Arcanist created the diff based on a revision prior to
r247991 for some reason.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12964
Files:
tools/lldb-server/CMakeLists.txt
Index: tools/lldb-server/CMakeLists.txt
=
dsanders created this revision.
dsanders added subscribers: krytarowski, labath, lldb-commits.
Following on from r247991:
pthread is in LLDB_SYSTEM_LIBS so there's no need to explicitly add it to the
link.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12964
Files:
tools/lldb-server/CMakeLists.txt
Index: tools/ll
dsanders updated this revision to Diff 35075.
dsanders added a comment.
Pavel's suggestion to use LLDB_SYSTEM_LIBS works for me. Updated the patch.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12900
Files:
tools/lldb-server/CMakeLists.txt
Index: tools/lldb-server/CMakeLists.txt
=
dsanders added a comment.
This patch does the trick for me but I'm not certain it's the right fix
overall. Could someone take a look?
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12900
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi
dsanders created this revision.
dsanders added a subscriber: lldb-commits.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12900
Files:
tools/lldb-server/CMakeLists.txt
Index: tools/lldb-server/CMakeLists.txt
===
--- tools/lldb-server/CMakeLists.txt
+++
Author: dsanders
Date: Tue Sep 15 11:33:17 2015
New Revision: 247703
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=247703&view=rev
Log:
Fix build after llvm r247683 was reverted.
Modified:
lldb/trunk/source/Plugins/Disassembler/llvm/DisassemblerLLVMC.cpp
Modified: lldb/trunk/source/Plugins/D
26 matches
Mail list logo
