@@ -511,22 +513,58 @@ ValueObjectSP
StackFrame::GetValueForVariableExpressionPath(
VariableSP &var_sp, Status &error) {
ExecutionContext exe_ctx;
CalculateExecutionContext(exe_ctx);
+
bool use_DIL = exe_ctx.GetTargetRef().GetUseDIL(&exe_ctx);
+
if (use_DIL)
https://github.com/rocallahan edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120817
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -582,31 +531,92 @@ bool ThreadList::WillResume() {
// There are two special kinds of thread that have priority for "StopOthers":
// a "ShouldRunBeforePublicStop thread, or the currently selected thread. If
// we find one satisfying that critereon, put it here.
- Thre
https://github.com/rocallahan edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120817
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -582,31 +531,92 @@ bool ThreadList::WillResume() {
// There are two special kinds of thread that have priority for "StopOthers":
// a "ShouldRunBeforePublicStop thread, or the currently selected thread. If
// we find one satisfying that critereon, put it here.
- Thre
@@ -582,31 +531,92 @@ bool ThreadList::WillResume() {
// There are two special kinds of thread that have priority for "StopOthers":
// a "ShouldRunBeforePublicStop thread, or the currently selected thread. If
// we find one satisfying that critereon, put it here.
- Thre
@@ -582,31 +531,92 @@ bool ThreadList::WillResume() {
// There are two special kinds of thread that have priority for "StopOthers":
// a "ShouldRunBeforePublicStop thread, or the currently selected thread. If
// we find one satisfying that critereon, put it here.
- Thre
https://github.com/rocallahan updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120817
>From a3968690f394f15083839ea91e9908d6d7d1e886 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Robert O'Callahan
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 23:40:34 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] [lldb] Move thread-notification setup to happen later
https://github.com/felipepiovezan updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122817
>From b42dc01256c8a433629d3594d54e942417705f83 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Felipe de Azevedo Piovezan
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 14:47:08 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [lldb] Remove unfiltered stop reason pro
jasonmolenda wrote:
> > clang-format on the test is actually problematic for the breakpoint regex,
> > so I am just going to ignore it.
>
> you can do `// clang-format off` / `// clang-format on` around it, if you
> want to bother.
(you could also just set the regex breakpoint on the string y
jasonmolenda wrote:
> clang-format on the test is actually problematic for the breakpoint regex, so
> I am just going to ignore it.
you can do `// clang-format off` / `// clang-format on` around it, if you want
to bother.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122817
_
felipepiovezan wrote:
clang-format on the test is actually problematic for the breakpoint regex, so I
am just going to ignore it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122817
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.
GeorgeHuyubo wrote:
PR to revert the problematic commit:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122816
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120814
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-debuginfo
Author: None (GeorgeHuyubo)
Changes
This reverts commit 7b808e73aa0193c8a42eae8f2420a803f424bee1.
Previous commit which change default debuginfod cache path and pruning policy
settings is problematic. It broke multiple tests across lldb and l
https://github.com/GeorgeHuyubo created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122816
This reverts commit 7b808e73aa0193c8a42eae8f2420a803f424bee1.
Previous commit which change default debuginfod cache path and pruning policy
settings is problematic. It broke multiple tests across lldb and
slydiman wrote:
@DavidSpickett
> Or you can tell me a 1/2 sentence summary of it and I'll meld it into release
> notes style
lldb-server now listens to a single port for gdbserver connections and provides
it to the connection handler processes. This allows only 2 ports to be opened
in the fi
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: John Harrison (ashgti)
Changes
This moves the ownership of the threads that forward stdout/stderr to the DAP
object itself to ensure that the threads are joined and that the forwarding is
cleaned up when the DAP connection is disconnected.
https://github.com/ashgti created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122783
This moves the ownership of the threads that forward stdout/stderr to the DAP
object itself to ensure that the threads are joined and that the forwarding is
cleaned up when the DAP connection is disconnected.
T
https://github.com/brad0 closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122533
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Author: Brad Smith
Date: 2025-01-13T14:37:06-05:00
New Revision: de252ec1c6b45626a58aa34ea99dee58cc40
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/de252ec1c6b45626a58aa34ea99dee58cc40
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/de252ec1c6b45626a58aa34ea99dee58cc40.diff
LO
https://github.com/JDevlieghere approved this pull request.
LGTM. Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122533
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/JDevlieghere approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122712
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -79,3 +81,26 @@ def test_adding_thread_different_process(self):
self.assertTrue(error.Fail())
error = options.AddThread(thread)
self.assertTrue(error.Success())
+
+def test_removing_and_adding_insertion_order(self):
+"""Test insertion orde
https://github.com/JDevlieghere updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121860
>From e82cc29033102dfed2a145e7235be8743c3bbdbe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonas Devlieghere
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2025 18:13:16 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Add OptionValueFormatEntityList
---
lldb/include/l
ldionne wrote:
Apologies for the spam everyone, I rebased this onto `main` and didn't realize
the merge base was set to something else, causing this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115380
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llv
https://github.com/ldionne edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115380
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/JDevlieghere updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121860
>From e82cc29033102dfed2a145e7235be8743c3bbdbe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonas Devlieghere
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2025 18:13:16 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Add OptionValueFormatEntityList
---
lldb/include/l
@@ -79,3 +81,26 @@ def test_adding_thread_different_process(self):
self.assertTrue(error.Fail())
error = options.AddThread(thread)
self.assertTrue(error.Success())
+
+def test_removing_and_adding_insertion_order(self):
+"""Test insertion orde
Prabhuk wrote:
@GeorgeHuyubo I am part of the Fuchsia toolchain team and we are seeing the
same `tools/llvm-debuginfod-find/cache.test` test failure in our toolchain
builders as well. Logs:
https://logs.chromium.org/logs/fuchsia/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8726076614943013857/+/u/clang/tests/st
https://github.com/jimingham closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119764
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Author: jimingham
Date: 2025-01-13T10:08:50-08:00
New Revision: 7c165f7fccfd40ae3bc2823d0ccd50257c21ab3e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7c165f7fccfd40ae3bc2823d0ccd50257c21ab3e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7c165f7fccfd40ae3bc2823d0ccd50257c21ab3e.diff
LOG
https://github.com/JDevlieghere updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121860
>From e82cc29033102dfed2a145e7235be8743c3bbdbe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonas Devlieghere
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2025 18:13:16 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Add OptionValueFormatEntityList
---
lldb/include/l
DavidSpickett wrote:
>From the Discourse thread:
> I also went through all the commits since the llvmorg-20-init tag until
> today, and noted anything I thought might warrant a release note.
If there was unfinished work in 19 that is now finished by later PRs that's
fair to include too.
> I a
Jlalond wrote:
Hey @DavidSpickett, sure I'm drafting that up now. What time frame should we
include commits from? I ask because one of my original patches added [64b
support, and paging](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95312). I assume
we could include anyway as I don't see it in the
GeorgeHuyubo wrote:
Working on fixing the tests broke by this diff.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120814
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/ldionne closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105990
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
ldionne wrote:
Closing as stale, please feel free to reopen if you want to pursue this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105990
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-comm
Jlalond wrote:
@JDevlieghere friendly bump, I just wanna sneak this into our release this
week, I think all the comments are addressed!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119052
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://
https://github.com/Jlalond updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122541
>From 5a756db04b1e5124b99fa44c162439fbf8385aee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacob Lalonde
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 14:26:10 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] Make the thread list for SBSaveCoreOptions iterable
---
ll
Michael137 wrote:
Added tests and updated PR description.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122265
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/Michael137 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122265
>From b43ffd0c1bb6e4f1ca5b8458848f574480021b08 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Buch
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 10:01:31 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [clang][DebugInfo] Expand detection of structured
bindings
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 7e01a322f850e86be9eefde8ae5a30e532d22cfa
66250572fc6a76ea7470028ad3529af8b8aef0b4 --e
https://github.com/Michael137 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122265
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/Michael137 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122265
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/Michael137 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122265
>From b43ffd0c1bb6e4f1ca5b8458848f574480021b08 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Buch
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 10:01:31 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [clang][DebugInfo] Expand detection of structured
bindings
DavidSpickett wrote:
Hi @slydiman, I am looking at commits that warrant a release note for LLDB 20,
and I think your work on lldb-server's port map might fit the bill. If you want
to do that yourself you can send a PR adding a bullet point to
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/llvm
DavidSpickett wrote:
Hi @Jlalond I am looking at commits that warrant a release note for LLDB 20,
and I think this and the rest of your Minidump changes might qualify. If you
want to do that yourself you can send a PR adding a bullet point to
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/llv
DavidSpickett wrote:
Hi @dlav-sc I am looking at commits that warrant a release note for LLDB 20,
and I think this is one of them. If you want to do that yourself you can send a
PR adding a bullet point to
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/llvm/docs/ReleaseNotes.md#changes-to-lld
DavidSpickett wrote:
Hi @AlexeyMerzlyakov I am looking at commits that warrant a release note for
LLDB 20, and I think this is one of them. If you want to do that yourself you
can send a PR adding a bullet point to
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/llvm/docs/ReleaseNotes.md#change
https://github.com/Michael137 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122265
>From b43ffd0c1bb6e4f1ca5b8458848f574480021b08 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Buch
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 10:01:31 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clang][DebugInfo] Expand detection of structured
bindings
labath wrote:
Same here, and the lldb debuginfod test is failing as well:
```
==
FAIL: test_debuginfod_executable
(TestDebuginfod.DebugInfodTests.test_debuginfod_executable)
Test behavior with the full binary available from D
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Pavel Labath (labath)
Changes
This doesn't make much of a difference now, but it makes it easier to add
-gsimple-template-names support to these functions (the idea is to add an
argument to say whether you want the name as spelled in the d
https://github.com/labath created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122712
This doesn't make much of a difference now, but it makes it easier to add
-gsimple-template-names support to these functions (the idea is to add an
argument to say whether you want the name as spelled in the deb
Michael137 wrote:
> Did you try to modify `IgnoreUnlessSpelledInSource` to support CallExpr?
Updated to use this approach in latest commit. Seems to work well (including
the explicit object parameter case). Didn't find a great way to test this in
the clang AST unit-tests yet. Trying to underst
https://github.com/Michael137 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122265
>From b43ffd0c1bb6e4f1ca5b8458848f574480021b08 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Buch
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 10:01:31 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang][DebugInfo] Expand detection of structured
bindings
@@ -2393,10 +2393,29 @@ Function *DWARFASTParserClang::ParseFunctionFromDWARF(
assert(func_type == nullptr || func_type != DIE_IS_BEING_PARSED);
const user_id_t func_user_id = die.GetID();
+
+// The base address of the scope for any of the debugging information
+
@@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ class Function : public UserID, public SymbolContextScope {
/// The section offset based address for this function.
Function(CompileUnit *comp_unit, lldb::user_id_t func_uid,
lldb::user_id_t func_type_uid, const Mangled &mangled,
-
@@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ class Function : public UserID, public SymbolContextScope {
/// The section offset based address for this function.
Function(CompileUnit *comp_unit, lldb::user_id_t func_uid,
lldb::user_id_t func_type_uid, const Mangled &mangled,
-
@@ -3,17 +3,30 @@
# int baz();
# int bar() { return 47; }
# int foo(int flag) { return flag ? bar() : baz(); }
-# The function bar has been placed "in the middle" of foo.
+# The function bar has been placed "in the middle" of foo, and the function
+# entry point is deliberately
DavidSpickett wrote:
> The latter bits could be added to the qemu testing page, I'll see if any of
> it overlaps.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122694
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117861
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-com
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: David Spickett (DavidSpickett)
Changes
There's a lot of fiddly bits to get right here, so I've added a more complete
example and explained why you might choose one method over another.
I thought about adding this to the qemu testing page,
https://github.com/DavidSpickett edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122694
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/DavidSpickett created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122694
There's a lot of fiddly bits to get right here, so I've added a more complete
example and explained why you might choose one method over another.
I thought about adding this to the qemu testing page, as t
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+"""
+Test lldb's ability to read and write the LoongArch LASX registers.
+"""
+
+import lldb
+from lldbsuite.test.decorators import *
+from lldbsuite.test.lldbtest import *
+from lldbsuite.test import lldbutil
+
+
+class LoongArch64LinuxRegisters(TestBase):
+
https://github.com/DavidSpickett edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120664
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/DavidSpickett approved this pull request.
The tests are excellent, thanks!
This all LGTM, assuming @SixWeining agrees.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120664
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https:
https://github.com/DavidSpickett edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120664
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
DavidSpickett wrote:
Also because shrinkwrap defaults to putting this all in Docker, it can cause
VPNs to do strange things. If so, there is an option to in shrinkwrap not use
the docker "runtime" as it calls it, or disable the VPN temporarily.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117861
DavidSpickett wrote:
I do this using 1 build that is a host build, with no options changed from the
usual recipe. Then a second cross compilation build done like
https://lldb.llvm.org/resources/build.html#example-1-cross-compiling-for-linux-arm64-on-ubuntu-host
in which I just build `ninja lldb
Michael137 wrote:
> > > Did you try to modify `IgnoreUnlessSpelledInSource` to support CallExpr?
> >
> >
> > Yea I was thinking about it initially. But I wasn't sure what that would
> > look like tbh. IIUC `IgnoreImplicitMemberCallSingleStep` will unwrap
> > `CXXMemberCallExpr` into the under
https://github.com/wangleiat updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120664
>From 7e56f86ec79865de0c2bc49ffa3f9f2b17a6f36f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: wanglei
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 09:10:10 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20in?=
=?UTF-8
@@ -40,49 +40,63 @@ class ProcessLaunchInfo;
static bool
GetOpenBSDProcessArgs(const ProcessInstanceInfoMatch *match_info_ptr,
ProcessInstanceInfo &process_info) {
- if (process_info.ProcessIDIsValid()) {
-int mib[4] = {CTL_KERN, KERN_PROC, KERN_PROC_
72 matches
Mail list logo
