llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Lily Wang (LilyWangLL)
Changes
I am a member of Microsoft vcpkg, due to there are new changes merged by
microsoft/STL#5105, which revealed a conformance issue in `llvm`. It
must add include `` to fix this error.
Compiler error wit
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
https://github.com/LilyWangLL created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118059
I am a member of Microsoft vcpkg, due to there are new changes merged by
microsoft/STL#5105, which revealed a conformance issue in `llvm`. It must add
include `` to fix this error.
Compiler error with this
medismailben wrote:
> > I'm only using it in an internal branch
>
>
>
> Not sure what the protocol is for this (CC @JDevlieghere @labath). At the
> very least we should have some coverage for it in the test-suite. There's
> precedent for this, e.g., APIs that only get exercised on the Swift
https://github.com/wangleiat created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118043
This patch adds support for setting/clearing hardware watchpoints and
breakpoints on LoongArch 64-bit hardware.
Refer to the following document for the hw break/watchpoint:
https://loongson.github.io/LoongArch
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: wanglei (wangleiat)
Changes
This patch adds support for setting/clearing hardware watchpoints and
breakpoints on LoongArch 64-bit hardware.
Refer to the following document for the hw break/watchpoint:
https://loongson.github.io/LoongArch-Do
https://github.com/jasonmolenda closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117832
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Author: Jason Molenda
Date: 2024-11-28T10:31:57-08:00
New Revision: 448ac7d3418a31d35b462440c8bf644287efac8a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/448ac7d3418a31d35b462440c8bf644287efac8a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/448ac7d3418a31d35b462440c8bf644287efac8a.diff
https://github.com/kastiglione approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117832
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/JDevlieghere approved this pull request.
I like @Michael137's suggestion and the name makes it obvious what's going on.
LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117832
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.or
https://github.com/Michael137 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117500
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -87,7 +87,8 @@ void CommandObjectDWIMPrint::DoExecute(StringRef command,
DumpValueObjectOptions dump_options = m_varobj_options.GetAsDumpOptions(
m_expr_options.m_verbosity, m_format_options.GetFormat());
- dump_options.SetHideRootName(suppress_result);
+ dump_opt
https://github.com/Michael137 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117808
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/Michael137 deleted
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117808
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Michael137 wrote:
> Reference in
Not sure what the protocol is for this (CC @JDevlieghere @labath). At the very
least we should have some coverage for it in the test-suite. There's precedent
for this, e.g., APIs that only get exercised on the Swift branch, but at least
those are on a public f
https://github.com/Michael137 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117808
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Michael137 wrote:
This is quite an interesting case. Basically the issue arises only because we
have an `anonymous` struct in `B` with a base class that has an "indirect
field" called `x`:
```
IndirectFieldDecl 0x104145868 <> implicit x 'int'
|-Field 0x104145758 '' 'A::(anonymous struct)'
`-
https://github.com/labath updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117996
>From 78b8dabf1ada3d567d3f1a193fdf0cc0f159cb37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pavel Labath
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 17:05:23 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [lldb] Use the function block as a source for function
ranges
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 871e3dc8d8717bbcf5e3ad44331a21c3417c2639
78b8dabf1ada3d567d3f1a193fdf0cc0f159cb37 --e
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
# CHECK: 1 match found in {{.*}}
# CHECK: Summary: {{.*}}`foo
-# CHECK: Function: id = {{.*}}, name = "foo", ranges =
[0x-0x0007)[0x0007-0x000e)[0x0014-0x001b)[0x001b-0x0
@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@ REQUIRES: system-windows, lld
RUN: %build --compiler=clang-cl --nodefaultlib --output=%t.exe
%S/Inputs/FunctionNestedBlockTest.cpp
RUN: lldb-test symbols -find=function -file FunctionNestedBlockTest.cpp -line
4 %t.exe | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-FUNCTION %
@@ -3240,8 +3195,17 @@ size_t SymbolFileDWARF::ParseBlocksRecursive(Function
&func) {
DWARFDIE function_die =
dwarf_cu->GetNonSkeletonUnit().GetDIE(function_die_offset);
if (function_die) {
-ParseBlocksRecursive(*comp_unit, &func.GetBlock(false), function_die,
-
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Pavel Labath (labath)
Changes
This is a follow-up/reimplementation of #115730. While working on that
patch, I did not realize that the correct (discontinuous) set of ranges is
already stored in the block representing the whole function. Th
https://github.com/labath created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117996
This is a follow-up/reimplementation of #115730. While working on that patch, I
did not realize that the correct (discontinuous) set of ranges is already
stored in the block representing the whole function. The
https://github.com/Michael137 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117808
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -6754,12 +6754,12 @@ size_t TypeSystemClang::GetIndexOfChildMemberWithName(
llvm::StringRef field_name = field->getName();
if (field_name.empty()) {
CompilerType field_type = GetType(field->getType());
+std::vector save_indices = c
https://github.com/Michael137 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117808
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -6754,12 +6754,12 @@ size_t TypeSystemClang::GetIndexOfChildMemberWithName(
llvm::StringRef field_name = field->getName();
if (field_name.empty()) {
CompilerType field_type = GetType(field->getType());
+std::vector save_indices = c
DavidSpickett wrote:
Will keep this in review until the code changes land. I might not reflect
reality if changes are made along the way.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117860
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https:
Michael137 wrote:
> Here's the test case I used: $ cat main.cpp struct A { struct { int x = 1; };
> int y = 2;6 } a;
>
> struct B { // Anonymous struct inherits another struct. struct : public A {
> int z = 3; }; int w = 4; A a; } b;
>
> return 0; // Set a breakpoint here } $ clang++ -g -O0 m
Author: Pavel Labath
Date: 2024-11-28T11:13:29+01:00
New Revision: 871e3dc8d8717bbcf5e3ad44331a21c3417c2639
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/871e3dc8d8717bbcf5e3ad44331a21c3417c2639
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/871e3dc8d8717bbcf5e3ad44331a21c3417c2639.diff
@@ -0,0 +1,213 @@
+//===-- HostInfoAIX.cpp -===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apach
@@ -0,0 +1,213 @@
+//===-- HostInfoAIX.cpp -===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apach
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+//===-- HostInfoAIX.h -*- C++ -*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache
34 matches
Mail list logo
