Re: [Live-demo] [OSGeo] #1256: python liblas error

On 03/02/2014 11:38 PM, OSGeo wrote: > Comment: > > the error is: > OSError: liblas_c.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or > directory > > /usr/lib/liblas_c.so.2.2.0 exists, it's easy to just add the missing > symlink. > hopefully worked-around in r11304. > > The actual sy

Re: [Live-demo] OSGeo live 7.9 download issue

On 03/14/2014 10:49 PM, Wu, Qiusheng (wuqe) wrote: > Hi all, > > The links on sourceforge.net for downloading osgeo-live-7.9.iso are not > working. Any other alternative links I can download? > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/osgeo-live/files/7.9/ Specifying a mirror seems to workaround the

Re: [Live-demo] Problem with spatialite-gui

On 11/22/2014 04:07 PM, Micha Silver wrote: > There is a serious bug somewhere between spatialite-gui and the new > wxgtk-3.0. > This has rendered spatialite-gui nearly unusable. It crashes any time you try > to > load a shapefile; typing into the sql window is sporadic and unreliable. In > sh

Re: [Live-demo] Problem with spatialite-gui

On 11/22/2014 08:38 PM, Micha Silver wrote: > Since the OSGeo Live policy is to stick with apt-getable packages as much as > possible, I guess the best is to wait till the debian fix filters down to > ubuntugis. Why wait? You just need to ping someone who can update the package for OSGeo Live an

Re: [Live-demo] Who will be at FOSDEM?

On 12/01/2014 10:21 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > I know that at least Bas (Couwenberg) and I will be going to FOSDEM[1] > 31 january-1 february in Brussels (Belgium). Since this year there > will be both a geospatial devroom [1] and a distributions devroom [2], > it may be an ideal timing for hav

Re: [Live-demo] qgis 2.6.1 pluging for grass7

On 05/21/2015 03:49 PM, Giuseppe Amatulli wrote: > Do you know if the OSGeo-Live 8.5 supports the qgis-plugin-grass for GRASS7 > and if yes may be available trough the ppa:osgeolive/release-8.5? GRASS 7 support for the native QGIS plugin is still being developed upstream, see: http://www.gissula.

Re: [Live-demo] Starting build cycle for OSGeo-Live 9.0

On 05/22/2015 11:16 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 9:26 PM, wrote: > >> But if I look at the "gpsprune" package, I can see version 15.1 in Trusty, >> 17.1 in Vivid, 17.2 in Debian stable-backports, but only 10.1 in >> ubuntugis-unstable (unless I'm reading it wrong). So

Re: [Live-demo] Starting build cycle for OSGeo-Live 9.0

On 05/23/2015 12:51 AM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg > wrote: >> On 05/22/2015 11:16 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: >>> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 9:26 PM, wrote: >>> >>>> But if I look at the "gpsp

Re: [Live-demo] GRASS and QGIS versions on OSGeo-Live?

On 02-08-15 23:14, Markus Neteler wrote: > On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Cameron Shorter > wrote: >> On 2/08/2015 1:30 am, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>> >>> You can't drop GRASS 6 without breaking QGIS 2.8. For GRASS 7 support you >>> need QGIS &g

[Live-demo] osm2pgsql needs an update

Triggered by the announcement of the osm2psql PPA on the OSM dev list [0] and the resulting discussion about osm2psql packaging for Ubuntu, it became clear that OSGeo-Live includes and old release of osm2pgsql (0.85.0). For the new OSGeo-Live development cycle osm2psql should be updated to the lat

[Live-demo] Custom OSGeo-Live packages with official Debian packaging available

osm2psql is not the only custom package in OSGeo-Live that also has packaging available in Debian. The following packages can also switch to just rebuilding the source packages from Debian for OSGeo-Live, in random order: * python-netcdf4 (1.1.0-0~trusty1) Available in Debian as: netcdf4-pyt

Re: [Live-demo] Upcoming 2016 FOSS4G events? - and OSGeo-Live draft press release and schedule

On 19-11-15 09:54, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > gdal (1.11.2+dfsg-3ubuntu1) wily; urgency=medium > > * Merge with Debian; remaining changes: > - Cherry-pick upstream patch to fix compatiblity with poppler ≥ 0.31. > > Do you know if this patch is included in 1.11.3? Yes, Even backported the p

Re: [Live-demo] Retiring GPS-Drive from OSGeo-Live

On 08-02-16 11:12, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Cameron Shorter wrote: >> Proposal: >> That GPS-Drive be retired from OSGeo-Live. >> >> Cameron +1 > > Johan: +1 > > gpsdrive has been removed from debian for the same reason: > https://bugs.debian.org/809674 As the pe

Re: [Live-demo] Motion: Include Jupyter as beta in 9.5 release

On 10-03-16 11:12, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: > In order to resolve the Jupyter mess, this is my new proposal: > > 1. Accept the pull request from Massimo > https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive-Notebooks/pull/5 > This way his work will be acknowledged, the same way as previous > Notebook work done by Br

Re: [Live-demo] Press Release DRAFT v9.5

On 03/21/2016 03:22 AM, Brian M Hamlin wrote: > https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc_Press_Release_66#OSGeo-Live_9.5_Released > > any thoughts about "geopackage" support ? major features missing ? For GeoPackage support you're missing GDAL 2.0 and SpatiaLite 4.3.0 at least. Kind Regards,

Re: [Live-demo] OpenJDK

On 03/23/2016 10:57 PM, Pieter du Plooy wrote: > If I install OpenJDK 8, will it break anything on an OsgeoLive install? It shouldn't, but if it does you can change the java alternatives back to openjdk-7 with the update-java-alternatives utility [0] to switch the alternatives for all JRE executab

Re: [Live-demo] pgRouting

On 04/28/2016 08:02 PM, Vicky Vergara wrote: > I don't know what to do to have osm2pgrouting packaged > > maybe you can guide me on that. You're very welcome to (help) maintain the osm2pgrouting packaging within the Debian GIS team where most other source packages included in OSGeo-Live are maint

Re: [Live-demo] pgRouting

On 04/29/2016 06:16 PM, Vicky Vergara wrote: > Thanks > Lots to read & learn. > So I'll try from the beginning: > I can see this: > https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?packages=pgrouting > and I don't understand the basics, like the difference between stable and > unstable > popcorn > I can see

Re: [Live-demo] pgRouting

plugin for Qgis for > pgRouting versions 2.1 & 2.2. > 5. I need to modify the pgRouting workshop to be used with this latest > version for the Bonn FOSS4G. > 6. On summer I will be mentoring two GSoC students. > > My advantage is that my kids are over 20 years old. > >

Re: [Live-demo] pgRouting

On 05/01/2016 07:05 AM, Daniel Kastl wrote: > When I looked at the source files in the "debian" folder, I realized, that > it uses a very old and outdated description of the project. > It's not clear to me, how to apply changes myself. It's a rather easy to > solve issue, so I thought I just ask yo

Re: [Live-demo] pgRouting

On 04/29/2016 08:55 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > I've used the packaging from the OSGeo-Live PPA and imported that into > the git repository for use within the Debian GIS team: > > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-grass/osm2pgrouting.git > > The packaging has

Re: [Live-demo] netCDF4 libs

On 05/11/2016 05:50 AM, Brian M Hamlin wrote: > How can I check the versions of the netCDF stack as things progress ? That depends. The latest versions available in Debian and upstream are included in the Debian GIS DDPO: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=pkg-grass-de...@lists.aliot

Re: [Live-demo] PyWPS application

On 05/13/2016 01:25 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote: > I'm +1 for inviting PyWPS to join OSGeo-Live. As requested on IRC, also posting here: 23:32 < sebastic> I'm also in favor of including pywps, a natural development since it was in 9.5 already :) Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE

Re: [Live-demo] PostGIS 2.2 and gdal2, what is ahead ?

On 05/31/2016 11:00 PM, Brian M Hamlin wrote: > postgis_2.2.1+dfsg-3~xenial0.dsc > > inside, the Build-Depends: > > libgdal-dev (>= 1.11.2+dfsg-3~) | libgdal1-dev (>= 1.9.0~) > > Q. How does that fit with gdal2 ? Those are just the minimum version required to build the package. These ver

[Live-demo] QGIS & osgEarth 2.7

QGIS upstream has recently disabled the globle plugin when built with osgEarth 2.7 [0] because the initial changes were not sufficient to support anything newer that 2.5 [1]. Proper support for 2.7 has been merged recently too [2], but has not been backported to 2.14 LTR. Assuming you want to stic

Re: [Live-demo] Inviting new members for the OSGeo-Live Project Management Committee

On 06/06/2016 11:40 AM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: > I would like to nominate Astrid Emde for the OSGeoLive PSC. > Astrid has been heavily involved in OSGeoLive development (MapBender > maintainer), various presentations in conferences, and one of the most > active translation maintainers (second to Ca

Re: [Live-demo] OSGeo-Live team needs help: Someone who looks after OSM data, tools and writes documentation is needed

On 06/11/2016 01:06 PM, Astrid Emde wrote: > Hello OSM enthusiasts, I've forwarded this message to the OSM talk & dev lists, which most OSM enthusiasts frequent. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 ___

Re: [Live-demo] MOTION: Pull request #134 Workshop installers

On 06/29/2016 11:14 AM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: > I would like to add a "workshop" folder in our source tree, to attract > FOSS4G workshop leaders to submit workshop installers (no data, just > shell scripts to setup extra material). This way, workshop leaders can > have their material easily instal

Re: [Live-demo] python-osmium ?

Hi Brian, Please don't CC me explicitly, I'm subscribed to the list. The short answer is that there is no python-osmium package. You're looking for the wrong package. If you're looking for a package, using the tracker is you're best option: https://tracker.debian.org/ It has a search function

Re: [Live-demo] python-osmium ?

On 07/09/2016 07:47 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > * osmcoastline, builds: >- osmcoastline >https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/osmcoastline Of the various new osmium packages, only osmcoastline is affected by GDAL transitions. It will need to be rebuilt with GDAL 2.1 from the ni

[Live-demo] Comparing package versions between OSGeo-Live, Debian & Ubuntu

To get an overview of the package versions in OSGeo-Live, Debian & Ubuntu I've whipped up a script to compare the versions between the three repositories. For Debian & Ubuntu the public UDD (Ultimate Debian Database) instance is used, and for OSGeo-Live the Sources file is downloaded from the PPA

Re: [Live-demo] Fwd: Re: [Incubator] requiring CLA signing

On 08/27/16 22:41, Cameron Shorter wrote: I like the GeoNode process for signing Contributor License Agreements, and suggest that we should introduce something similar for OSGeo-Live clahub.com I'd argue for dropping a CLA, it only raises the barrier to contribute without

Re: [Live-demo] Fwd: Re: [Incubator] requiring CLA signing

On 08/28/16 12:33, Cameron Shorter wrote: On 28/08/2016 11:12 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 08/27/16 22:41, Cameron Shorter wrote: I like the GeoNode process for signing Contributor License Agreements, and suggest that we should introduce something similar for OSGeo-Live clahub.com

Re: [Live-demo] Next OSGeo-Live meeting - discuss release plans

On 11/08/2016 08:16 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote: > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?hour=19&min=30&sec=0&p1=179&p2=189&p3=224&p4=22&p5=240&p6=196&p7=215 That would be today in less than 10 minutes, I guess you meant next week? Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750

Re: [Live-demo] Python 2 and 3 in the field today

On 11/11/2016 05:24 PM, Brian M Hamlin wrote: > this article was linked in the YCombinator News feed today.. > > https://semaphoreci.com/blog/2016/11/11/python-versions-used-in-commercial-projects-2016-edition.html It only going to see more adoption now that Ubuntu has switched the default Python

Re: [Live-demo] Python 2 and 3 in the field today

On 11/11/2016 06:52 PM, Brian M Hamlin wrote: > Here at UC Berkeley, it seems that far more people use the Anaconda > distribution system,than any Debian python packaging. > The Mac OS is perhaps more than fifty percent of serious science users, by casual observation, > and the pain and dysfunctio

[Live-demo] zoo-project packaging / update to 1.6.0-rc1

Angelos reported on IRC that zoo-project 1.5.0+svn780+ds failed to build with OTB 5.8 and that 1.6.0-rc1 was available, so I've updated the packaging for the new RC. https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-grass/zoo-project.git Because of the ongoing OpenSSL transition in Debian unstable, I needed t

Re: [Live-demo] OTB 5.8 issue

On 02/01/2017 12:43 PM, Bas Couwenberg wrote: > On 2017-02-01 12:39, Pieter du Plooy wrote: >> How does one include such an environment variable in Lubuntu's .desktop >> files? > > Edit the Exec line in the .desktop file like so: > > Exec=env OTB_APPLICATION_PATH=/usr/lib/otb/applications montev

Re: [Live-demo] Motion: Invite Ben Caradoc-Davies to join OSGeo-Live PMC

On 03/17/2017 09:17 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote: > I'd like to raise a motion to officially invite Ben Caradoc-Davies to > join the OSGeo-Live PMC [1] Didn't we already do this on IRC? +1, FWIW. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1

Re: [Live-demo] Motion: Invite Nicolas Roelandt (baka niko) to join OSGeo-Live Project Management Committee

On 03/18/2017 12:27 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote: > I'd like to raise a motion to officially invite Nicolas Roelandt to join > the OSGeo-Live PMC [1] +1 > Sebastian Couwenburg Please stop reusing this typo, see: https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Management#PSC_Members And my From address. Ki

Re: [Live-demo] Reducing scope of OSGeo-Live for next 11.0 release - first pass review

On 04/23/2017 12:51 AM, Cameron Shorter wrote: > Angelos and I have both contributed to a first pass review of the status > of projects on OSGeo-Live and put notes into column S, "11.0 Comments" > in our status spreadsheet: > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Q5BaEgQtgw4O1bXyeWMlM8XtAOhUgc

Re: [Live-demo] Motion: Move from 2 releases to 1 per year

On 04/25/2017 01:16 AM, Cameron Shorter wrote: > As per weekly meeting discussion, we propose to switch from putting out > two releases per year to putting out one main release per year. -0 Release early, release often. Keep momentum by starting to work on the next release after the most recent f

Re: [Live-demo] Retiring mapnik from OSGeo-Live?

On 05/12/2017 10:50 AM, Cameron Shorter wrote: > As per below, Dane is suggesting there are not volunteers available to > manage Mapnik's presence on OSGeo-Live, and as such is suggesting it is > a candidate for retiring. Since Dane requested removal, I don't think that further discussion is requi

Re: [Live-demo] Retiring mapnik from OSGeo-Live?

On 05/12/2017 04:13 PM, Brian M Hamlin wrote: > this is nothing but a loss of OSGeo-Live, and further seperates > Openstreetmap (which is thriving) and OSGeo. I dont see Dane "requesting > removal" actually. It appears to me that OSGeo is asking "is this a > candidate for removal" and the answer i

Re: [Live-demo] Draft press release about OSGeoLive reboot

On 05/28/2017 12:58 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote: > I've drafted a press release about the proposed reboot, based on our > conversations so far. > > https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc_Press_Release_77 Suggested contacts for some of the stray projects: * OpenLayers OpenLayers Developers

Re: [Live-demo] Review of gpsprune on OSGeo-Live 11.0

On 06/12/2017 08:55 PM, Activity Workshop wrote: > On 12/06/17 00:03, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: >> In case you have already tested gpsprune for 10.5 and all work fine, we can >> enable it ASAP. > Ok, well I haven't got a 10.5 image handy for testing, but I have run through > the steps with GpsPrune 18

Re: [Live-demo] Review of gpsprune on OSGeo-Live 11.0

On 06/16/2017 09:32 PM, Activity Workshop wrote: > On 12/06/17 21:00, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> Shouldn't gpsprune be upgraded to 18.6 and the overview & quickstart >> updated to reflect the latest version? > > Well yes, you're right, it would be ideal

Re: [Live-demo] Review of gpsprune on OSGeo-Live 11.0

ady in xenial and no newer version is included in the OSGeo-Live PPA there is nothing to worry about. Thanks to JOSM no longer requiring newer versions. >> On 17/6/17 6:28 am, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>> Or just rebuild the source package downloaded via tracker.debian.org >&g

Re: [Live-demo] Review of gpsprune on OSGeo-Live 11.0

On 06/18/2017 06:16 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: > I will backport the package from DebianGIS within the next 48h. You only need to copy the package from my staging PPA: >> I've created the backported package for you, the source is in the same >> git repository as the Debian package: >> >> https:

Re: [Live-demo] [live-demo] MOTION: Retire PyWPS from OSGeo-Live 11.0

On 07/11/2017 12:36 AM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: > Based on a previous IRC meeting logs [1], we had a veto vote (-1) on > removing PyWPS from the disk. > PyWPS quickstart has not been working for some time now [2] and we did > not hear back from the maintainers so far. > I would like to make an overr

Re: [Live-demo] [live-demo] MOTION: Revert to previous OSGeo-Live logo for 11.0 release, keep new OSGeo logo in docs

On 07/11/2017 12:47 AM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: > We have been discussing the new logo situation for a few weeks now and > it seems there are issues with all suggested new OSGeo-Live logos. > I feel that we should not hurry to prepare a new OSGeo-Live logo for the > upcoming 11.0 release, while at t

Re: [Live-demo] [live-demo] MOTION: Retire GMT from OSGeo-Live 11.0

On 07/11/2017 12:26 AM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: > Based on a previous IRC meeting logs [1], we had two veto votes (-1) on > removing GMT from the disk. > Given the fact that there has been no pull request with a revised GMT > quickstart, I would like to make an override motion (majority vote) for >

Re: [Live-demo] [live-demo] MOTION: Retire MB-System from OSGeo-Live 11.0

On 07/11/2017 12:31 AM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: > Based on a previous IRC meeting logs [1], we had a veto vote (-1) on > removing MB-System from the disk. > Given the fact that there has been no activity from the new > maintainer/volunteer with a revised MB-System quickstart, I would like > to make

Re: [Live-demo] Motion: lets go on with incubation and get listed as OSGeo Project

On 09/03/2017 04:53 PM, Vicky Vergara wrote: > Bas Couwenberg +0, I don't value the Incubation process much, being a Community Project should be sufficient. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1

Re: [Live-demo] Change IRC meeting start time to 19:30 UTC?

On 10/03/2017 12:03 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > I propose that we change the IRC meeting start time to 19:30 UTC to > accommodate daylight saving changes. Next meeting would be: > https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2017&month=10&day=9&hour=19&min=30&sec=0&ah=1&p1=22

Re: [Live-demo] MOTION: Migrate OSGeo-Live issues to another Trac instance

On 10/12/2017 10:43 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: > Just attended a SAC meeting, and an old issue was brought up: our issue > tracker is in OSGeo general instance, mixed with tickets from SAC and > others. > I would like to make a motion to move our tickets to another trac instance. +1, the OSGeo-Liv