Re: [Live-demo] OSGeo-Live poster

2013-06-21 Thread Activity Workshop
The poster looks great, that's a really useful contribution. If I may be picky, I'd like to suggest a few minor improvements, maybe somebody with LibreOffice can think about these when they're updating the details for 6.5. - The icon for GpsPrune shows the "R" logo, I guess this is an oversi

[Live-demo] Fonts in OpenJDK7

2013-07-15 Thread Activity Workshop
I haven't tried out a recent version of the live image, so please forgive my basic question. When the transition was made from a Sun JDK to an OpenJDK, were there any problems (or complaints) about the appearance of fonts within the java desktop OSGeo applications? Fonts being unattractive, men

Re: [Live-demo] Fonts in OpenJDK7

2013-07-16 Thread Activity Workshop
Thanks for your feedback, both of you. On 15/07/13 22:52, Hamish wrote: yes, try 'apt-get install gsfonts-x11 ttf-dejavu-extra' I already have both of those. for motif apps also you now need to do a manual install of the xfonts-100dpi and xfonts-75dpi packages. I have those two packages insta

Re: [Live-demo] updated presentation

2013-09-03 Thread Activity Workshop
> With or without [-] will not cause confusion or change the dissemination of our good name. You're right, but I still think that the name of the thing is important. Keeping it consistent isn't that hard. Then people who want to refer to this great thing aren't in doubt about what it's called.

Re: [Live-demo] price of the software

2014-04-01 Thread Activity Workshop
Alex, Your spreadsheet lists an ohloh repository for gpsprune. I've no idea who made this, or why, but it doesn't contain the source code for gpsprune - for some reason they've added just the images and the translation files, but none of the source code - hence why ohloh thinks gpsprune only has 7

Re: [Live-demo] OSGeo-Live and HeartBleed vulnerability

2014-04-17 Thread Activity Workshop
I don't want to be annoyingly picky, but maybe you'd like to: s/effected/affected/ s/start in/star in/ ___ Live-demo mailing list Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo http://live.osgeo.org http://wiki.osgeo.org/wi

Re: [Live-demo] Retire MapTiler from OSGeo-Live

2015-02-13 Thread Activity Workshop
Hi, I've had a quick look at the MapTiler source, and I agree with those who think it should be _kept_ in osgeo if at all possible. It seems to work fine, it looks good, seems very useful and is one of those things that's easy to demo too so it fits extremely well. All credit to Petr and the oth

Re: [Live-demo] Retire MapTiler from OSGeo-Live

2015-02-14 Thread Activity Workshop
If anyone would like to help with this, we now have a wiki page (thanks, Angelos!) https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/MapSlicer Anyone is welcome to fill something in in there, giving basic details and links. Also if anyone wants to make a start on the docs, the more hands the better! Regards, activ

Re: [Live-demo] Starting build cycle for OSGeo-Live 9.0

2015-05-21 Thread Activity Workshop
Hi all, Around this time in the build cycle I often get asked "what version of software should we take into the build process?" and I always answer the same thing - take the default package from the Ubuntu repositories which you're using for the build. It's just the easiest way for everyone. Fo

Re: [Live-demo] "descoping" OSGeo-Live

2017-04-19 Thread Activity Workshop
On 14/04/17 21:00, live-demo-requ...@lists.osgeo.org wrote: > While projects should rightly be concerned if OSGeo-Live only uses > OpenHub metrics to assess project health, they should be significantly > more concerned about the general public's assessment of their project. You're correct to say

Re: [Live-demo] About mapslicer/maptiler related to openHub

2017-04-26 Thread Activity Workshop
> So what do you suggest we do about MapSlicer? I'm wondering whether the > project is still a good candidate for including on OSGeo-Live. Angelos will probably want to answer this himself, but this is what I see: > 1. Is the project still useful and used? Difficult to say. I find it useful, and I

Re: [Live-demo] Review of gpsprune on OSGeo-Live 11.0

2017-06-11 Thread Activity Workshop
On 07/06/17 00:50, vi...@georepublic.de wrote: > 1. Reply to confirm the Project Overview is still accurate, or has been > updated, (and version numbers are correct): , > 2. Reply to confirm you have run a recent OSGeo-Live version (the previous > 10.5 version is ok), and updated the quickstart whe

Re: [Live-demo] Review of gpsprune on OSGeo-Live 11.0

2017-06-12 Thread Activity Workshop
On 12/06/17 00:03, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: > In case you have already tested gpsprune for 10.5 and all work fine, we can > enable it ASAP. Ok, well I haven't got a 10.5 image handy for testing, but I have run through the steps with GpsPrune 18.3 and as long as the test track is present on the disk,

Re: [Live-demo] Review of gpsprune on OSGeo-Live 11.0

2017-06-16 Thread Activity Workshop
On 12/06/17 21:00, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > Shouldn't gpsprune be upgraded to 18.6 and the overview & quickstart > updated to reflect the latest version? > > Kind Regards, > > Bas > Well yes, you're right, it would be ideal if we had v18.6. But currently my number 1 priority is to try to pre

Re: [Live-demo] Review of gpsprune on OSGeo-Live 11.0

2017-06-17 Thread Activity Workshop
On 16/06/17 22:43, Cameron Shorter wrote: > I agree with Sebastiaan that we should be updating to the latest stable > version of gpsprune if we can. I really don't think that's going to happen for this version of OSGeo-Live, given that the deadlines are mere hours away now. I would be happy to dis

[Live-demo] presentation.rst files

2017-06-24 Thread Activity Workshop
Just a quick question: can the en/presentation.rst file (and all the translations) be deleted now? It doesn't seem to make much sense to refer to a 2010 blogpost talking about "lightening" (ouch) any more. Also the en/presentation/index.html will need to be updated, presumably deleting the "New in