Re: [Live-demo] Issues of Current development

Hi Jorge, We have being working for about 6 months on having the translations on transifex, so we are going to continue this line for the time being. About where we will have the issues, right now we are making in the process of making an analysis of where exactly move/have the issues as the proje

Re: [Live-demo] Issues of Current development

Thanks, Ben. I will add just some "food for thought". I respect and I am thankful for the work already being done. If we are migrating to a new Trac instance, why don't we take the opportunity to change to github issues? With github issues, we can relate issues with PR. The changes to the repos a

Re: [Live-demo] Issues of Current development

Jorge, OSGeoLive uses OSGeo trac for issue . We are currently migrating to our own instance. Kind regards, Ben. On 07/11/17 13:34, Jorge Gustavo Rocha wrote: Hi Vicky, hi all, Both OSGeoLive and OSGeoLive-doc don't have issues enabled on Github. Is there any r

Re: [Live-demo] Issues of Current development

Hi Vicky, hi all, Both OSGeoLive and OSGeoLive-doc don't have issues enabled on Github. Is there any reason for not allowing issue reporting on these repositories? I prefer to see issues on the main repositories, not on users forks. I also prefer to see PR that fixes issues that were reported, to