On 03/23/2016 03:22 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 03/23/2016 10:57 PM, Pieter du Plooy wrote:
>> If I install OpenJDK 8, will it break anything on an OsgeoLive install?
>
> It shouldn't, but if it does you can change the java alternatives back
> to openjdk-7 with the update-java-alternativ
On 03/23/2016 10:57 PM, Pieter du Plooy wrote:
> If I install OpenJDK 8, will it break anything on an OsgeoLive install?
It shouldn't, but if it does you can change the java alternatives back
to openjdk-7 with the update-java-alternatives utility [0] to switch the
alternatives for all JRE executab
Hi Alex
Thanks for the answer.
I only tried Whitebox with the OpenJDK included in the Live DVD (OpenJDK 7
i presume?), and it did not work. Should have known there was a OpenJDK 8
available.
If I install OpenJDK 8, will it break anything on an OsgeoLive install?
Pieter
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at
On 03/23/2016 02:28 PM, Pieter du Plooy wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> Maybe a dumb question. Would be at all possible to replace the OpenJDK
> with Oracle's JDK in order to test Whitebox GAT
> http://www.uoguelph.ca/~hydrogeo/Whitebox/download.shtml ?
>
> It does not work with OpenJDK.
>
> Pieter
>
>
Hi guys
Maybe a dumb question. Would be at all possible to replace the OpenJDK
with Oracle's JDK in order to test Whitebox GAT
http://www.uoguelph.ca/~hydrogeo/Whitebox/download.shtml ?
It does not work with OpenJDK.
Pieter
___
Live-demo mailing list
Thanks for the feedback Pieter.
What I think we should do is use OpenJDK where possible, but for the
next release, allow applications to make use of Sun java.
Pieter, is geomajas based upon geotools?
And as such, do you have any comment on how geotools works with OpenJDK?
Any tips you can shar
For the Geomajas project OpenJDK should not be a problem. I myself use it.
On 12/30/2011 09:48 AM, Brian Hamlin wrote:
jsanz tells me that GeoNetwork is also running well under OpenJDK for him
let this thread be an entrypoint for Java-app contacts to express their
enthusiasm, dismay, pain, resi
On 3 January 2012 21:28, Cameron Shorter wrote:
> Andre, Even, Jody,
> Thank you for your insights.
> Based on your advice, it sounds like it will be unwise to try to migrate all
> java based OSGeo applications to OpenJDK by our OSGeo-Live5.5 release due in
> March 2012.
>
> As such, I propose tha
Andre, Even, Jody,
Thank you for your insights.
Based on your advice, it sounds like it will be unwise to try to migrate
all java based OSGeo applications to OpenJDK by our OSGeo-Live5.5
release due in March 2012.
As such, I propose that Sun Java be included on OSGeo-Live5.5.
I'm hopeful that
> Questions for Geotools developers:
> 1. Do geotools based applications work on OpenJDK now?
Not sure; even if they did without a build box configured with OpenJDK to
ensure the library works in that environment it would not be considered a
supported platform for production use. I always figure
Le dimanche 01 janvier 2012 19:03:33, Andrea Aime a écrit :
> On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> > The brief facts:
> >> * Sun Java is not allowed to be packaged into future distributions (like
> >> ubuntu, debian, or OSGeo-Live). Instead, users are expected to download
> >> SunJa
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> The brief facts:
>> * Sun Java is not allowed to be packaged into future distributions (like
>> ubuntu, debian, or OSGeo-Live). Instead, users are expected to download
>> SunJava from Sun.
>> * SunJava 7 will be based upon OpenJDK.
>> * OpenJDK
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 11:26 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
> Geoserver-Devel, Jody,
>
> As per email thread below, the OSGeo-Live project is looking for guidance
> on what we should do regarding a migration to OpenJDK.
>
> The brief facts:
> * Sun Java is not allowed to be packaged into future dis
Geoserver-Devel, Jody,
As per email thread below, the OSGeo-Live project is looking for
guidance on what we should do regarding a migration to OpenJDK.
The brief facts:
* Sun Java is not allowed to be packaged into future distributions (like
ubuntu, debian, or OSGeo-Live). Instead, users are
An easy one is to add the extensions into libs/ext and then run uDig without
its "jre" folder so it uses the system default.
Geosolutions (i.e. Simone or Andrea) is the best point of contact with respect
to compatibility with OpenJDK. Personally I was not going to bother until Java
7 or Java 8
Jody and others,
Do you know if anyone has tested the viability of using OpenJDK with
JAI/ImageIO/ImageIO-EXT (with the geotools based applications)?
What would be involved in testing this? Who would know how?
On 30/12/11 20:29, Jody Garnett wrote:
Need to check out how well or poorly OpenJDK
Need to check out how well or poorly OpenJDK does with the JAI / ImageIO /
ImageIO-EXT combo for geotools based apps.
--
Jody Garnett
On Friday, 30 December 2011 at 6:48 PM, Brian Hamlin wrote:
> jsanz tells me that GeoNetwork is also running well under OpenJDK for
> him
>
> let this threa
jsanz tells me that GeoNetwork is also running well under OpenJDK for
him
let this thread be an entrypoint for Java-app contacts to express their
enthusiasm, dismay, pain, resignation or otherwise on the adaptation
of an OpenJDK-only LiveDVD release
best regards from Berkeley, California
==
B
18 matches
Mail list logo
