On 10 February 2018 at 11:11, Chris L wrote:
>
> > On Feb 9, 2018, at 5:25 AM, Mark Wiater
> wrote:
> >
> > In my experience, one does not see routes in the routing table for IPSEC
> based routes.
> >
> > IPSEC tunneling, I believe, happens before any NATting might. This might
> be why you're se
On 02/11/2018 03:29 PM, Marco wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Feb 2018 20:46:41 +
> "Joseph L. Casale" wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Chris
>> L Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2018 1:43 PM
>> To: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing
On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 10:21:08 -0600
Steven Spencer wrote:
> On 02/11/2018 03:29 PM, Marco wrote:
> > On Sun, 11 Feb 2018 20:46:41 +
> > "Joseph L. Casale" wrote:
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of
> >> Chris L Sent: Sunda
On 02/12/2018 11:43 AM, Marco wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 10:21:08 -0600
> Steven Spencer wrote:
>
>> On 02/11/2018 03:29 PM, Marco wrote:
>>> On Sun, 11 Feb 2018 20:46:41 +
>>> "Joseph L. Casale" wrote:
>>>
-Original Message-
From: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense
On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 11:59:09 -0600
Steven Spencer wrote:
> On 02/12/2018 11:43 AM, Marco wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 10:21:08 -0600
> > Steven Spencer wrote:
> >
> >> On 02/11/2018 03:29 PM, Marco wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 11 Feb 2018 20:46:41 +
> >>> "Joseph L. Casale" wrote:
> >>>
>
What is the default gateway of the destination (is there a route back to
pfSense)?
- Jim
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Marco wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 11:59:09 -0600
> Steven Spencer wrote:
>
> > On 02/12/2018 11:43 AM, Marco wrote:
> > > On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 10:21:08 -0600
> > > Steven S
-Original Message-
From: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Marco
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2018 2:30 PM
To: list@lists.pfsense.org
Subject: Re: [pfSense] Port forwards don't work on one machine
> I ran a wireshark on the destination and it received packets when
> “
Just to double check the config, so the pfSense router is set as the DMZ of the
ISP router? Have you tried deleting the rule and re-adding?
--
Steve Yates
ITS, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Marco
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2018
On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 14:12:53 -0500
James Ronald wrote:
> What is the default gateway of the destination (is there a route back
> to pfSense)?
pfSense is the default gateway of the destination.
Marco
___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/m
On Sun, 11 Feb 2018 15:23:43 -0800
Chris L wrote:
> > On Feb 11, 2018, at 1:29 PM, Marco wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 11 Feb 2018 20:46:41 +
> > "Joseph L. Casale" wrote:
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of
> >> Chris L Sent
On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 20:45:55 +
Steve Yates wrote:
> Just to double check the config, so the pfSense router is set as the
> DMZ of the ISP router?
No clue if the ISP device has a concept of DMZ. I configure it as
“Exposed Host”, so all communication is actually forwarded to the
pfSense box. I
I would think "exposed host" is what I am calling DMZ, from your
description.
If you have a firewall rule you can set it to log traffic (pass or
block I believe). Under status/system logs/settings there is a checkbox to log
packets blocked by the default block rule.
--
Steve
12 matches
Mail list logo
