Hi,
Last weekend I started with pfsense and during that I immediately
encountered an issue that I would like to report here (assuming this is the
right place to do so).
What happened was that after installing the WAN port got an IPv4 address
over DHCP but kept on spawning DHCPv6 requests at a rat
Hi,
Has anyone experience using USB3 to ethernet adapters ? I need an extra
interface but my HW (Intel NUC) does not have room for another card).
Anything recommendable?
Best regards, Frans.
___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/lis
You can turn off dhcp6 on the interfaces page
On Mon, May 2, 2016, 02:55 Frans Meulenbroeks
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Last weekend I started with pfsense and during that I immediately
> encountered an issue that I would like to report here (assuming this is the
> right place to do so).
>
> What happened
- Mensagem original -
> De: "Frans Meulenbroeks"
> Para: list@lists.pfsense.org
> Enviadas: Segunda-feira, 2 de maio de 2016 4:56:49
> Assunto: [pfSense] USB3 to ethernet adaptor
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone experience using USB3 to ethernet adapters ? I need an extra
> interface but my HW (Int
On 16-05-02 06:20 AM, Rafael Aquino wrote:
De: "Frans Meulenbroeks"
Has anyone experience using USB3 to ethernet adapters ? I need an extra
interface but my HW (Intel NUC) does not have room for another card).
Anything recommendable?
Best regards, Frans.
Hi there,
I´ve tried once an USB Multi-
Hi,
we have a strange problem on our PFSense since we migrated to 2.3. We use the
HAProxy package to enable external access to several of our webservices
(webmail, taiga, wiki, kimai, owncloud) running on VMs in our LAN. In order to
do that, we have configured several frontends as well as sever
The update check on 2.3-REL GUI offers me 2.3_1, yet I don't see mention of it
on pfsense.org.
Could it be that my system polls for dev branch releases and not only released
builds?
Or that the auto-update only revealed the beast before the blog on pfsense.org?
--
Meilleures salutations, Met vr
Hi List,
Did anyone experienced any success with using LetsEncrypt certificates (and
automatic ACME installation) on Pfsense V2.3 already ?
In case of yes, would there be a good write-up available to get me started ?
KR,
Kamaradski
___
pfSense mailin
On May 2, 2016 1:56 AM, "Frans Meulenbroeks"
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone experience using USB3 to ethernet adapters ? I need an extra
> interface but my HW (Intel NUC) does not have room for another card).
> Anything recommendable?
>
> Best regards, Frans.
> _
Hi,
I am looking for information about WMI SSO and how can I implement in
pfsense .. Someone could get some help and more information, I believe
that would be an ideal solution to implement without using packages
such as Samba.
I am willing to contribute to this project
--
Gustavo Freitas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
_1 would not be a development release. That would be a patch or an addendum
which I would assume handles the ntp security flaw patched in recent FreeBSD
security release.
https://www.freebsd.org/security/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-16:16.ntp.asc
On May
On Mon, 2 May 2016 07:57:55 -0600
WebDawg wrote:
> On May 2, 2016 1:56 AM, "Frans Meulenbroeks"
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Has anyone experience using USB3 to ethernet adapters ? I need an extra
> > interface but my HW (Intel NUC) does not have room for another card).
> > Anything recommendabl
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Dane Reugger wrote:
> I've seen this done with Aruba but not sure it's possible with PfSense but
> if it is I would love a guide to get it going.
>
Use OpenVPN. It doesn't care at all about the NAT. Many guides online for
setting up whole network VPN over OpenVPN.
> Le 2 mai 2016 à 16:19, Jason Hellenthal a écrit :
>
> Signé partie PGP
> _1 would not be a development release. That would be a patch or an addendum
> which I would assume handles the ntp security flaw patched in recent FreeBSD
> security release.
>
> https://www.freebsd.org/security/adviso
On 5/2/2016 10:24 AM, Vick Khera wrote:
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Dane Reugger wrote:
I've seen this done with Aruba but not sure it's possible with PfSense but
if it is I would love a guide to get it going.
Use OpenVPN. It doesn't care at all about the NAT. Many guides online for
se
I have a problem with IPv6 on a HA setup.
With IPv4, it is OK.
> IPv4 :
> VLAN MAC Address TypeAge Port
> Mod
> -+-+---+-+--+---
> 2776 .5e00.0168dynamic 0 Veth5
Hi,
Afaik, haproxy does not and did not reload on a wan-ip change on either
pfSense version.
There are a few options though.
-make haproxy frontend listen on 'any'
-or use a portforward to forward incoming traffic to 127.0.0.1 , haproxy
could then be listening on localhost:80.
Regards,
PiBa-NL
Same problem with me, even refreshing on mobile devices does not do any good. I
revert back to 2.2.6
From: List on behalf of daniel soto
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 4:21 PM
To: list@lists.pfsense.org
Subject: [pfSense] problems captive portal after upg
The /diag_packet_capture.php allows to set Address Family to IPv6 Only and
further Protocol to CARP. In such case it captures nothing (or rather filters
out too much). To actually see the ip-proto-112 packets to ff02::12, one has to
set Protocol to Any.
--
Meilleures salutations, Met vriendel
Sorry, top-posting this time.
Capturing on WAN(x:y:z:d8ff::2/64), link-local = fe80::250:56ff:febf:7014 (is
MASTER), I can see:
00:15:27.653423 IP6 (hlim 255, next-header VRRP (112) payload length: 36)
fe80::250:56ff:febf:7014 > ff02::12: ip-proto-112 36
00:15:28.663409 IP6 (hlim 255, next-head
> Le 2 mai 2016 à 20:24, Olivier Mascia a écrit :
>
> I have a problem with IPv6 on a HA setup.
>
> With IPv4, it is OK.
>
>> IPv4 :
>> VLAN MAC Address TypeAge Port
>> Mod
>> -+-+---+-+-
21 matches
Mail list logo
