High load average but low cpu (xenomai can be the explanation?)

2009-09-21 Thread diba...@libero.it
Hi, I have an MPC880 @133MHz. If I look into the load (with uptime) I get values around 3.0 but my CPU is always under 5 percent (top). How could I explain this? I'm using linux 2.6.19 with xenomai but no xenomai application is running at all. I have a cramfs on a nor flash. What could be the p

R: High load average but low cpu (xenomai can be the explanation?)

2009-09-22 Thread diba...@libero.it
daniele.bosi=mta...@lists.ozlabs.org [mailto:linuxppc-dev- bounces+daniele.bosi=mta...@lists.ozlabs.org] Per conto di diba...@libero.it >Oggetto: High load average but low cpu (xenomai can be the explanation?) > >Hi, > >I have an MPC880 @133MHz. If I look into the load (with uptime) I get >

__pa giving strange phys address on PPC

2009-01-07 Thread diba...@libero.it
Hi all, I'm using a linux 2.6.19 (from Denx ELDK) on a PPC MPC880. In a driver (that uses TDM channels) I have some calls to __pa to get the physical address corresponding to a virtual address. The physical address returned by __pa is higher than the maximum physical memory I have on the board.

Re: __pa giving strange phys address on PPC

2009-01-07 Thread diba...@libero.it
I used __pa on the result of an uncached_mem_alloc. Furthermore __pa should work on the return of a kmalloc? Thank you. ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

lapb discipline

2009-01-15 Thread diba...@libero.it
Hi all, I need a LAPB line discipline. Is there anything in the 2.6 kernels? Anyone has anything even unstable or to complete? ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev