RE: [RFC] Kprobes for book-e

2008-06-03 Thread Sulibhavi, Madhvesh
Kumar Gala wrote on Tuesday, June 03, 2008 11:01 AM > This is a patch that adds kprobes support for book-e style debug. Its > based on the patch posted by Madhvesh and assumes the > exception cleanup > that I've already posted. Thanks for your forward port of my previous kprobes patches. Few mon

RE: [RFC] Kprobes for book-e

2008-06-03 Thread Sulibhavi, Madhvesh
> -Original Message- > From: Kumar Gala [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 8:08 PM > To: Josh Boyer > Cc: Sulibhavi, Madhvesh; linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Paul Mackerras > Subject: Re: [RFC] Kprobes for book-e > > T

RE: [RFC] Kprobes for book-e

2008-06-03 Thread Sulibhavi, Madhvesh
> From: Josh Boyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 7:49 PM > To: Sulibhavi, Madhvesh > Cc: Kumar Gala; linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > Paul Mackerras > Subject: Re: [RFC] Kprobes for book-e > > Um, weird. What version of binuti

RE: [RFC] Kprobes for book-e

2008-06-03 Thread Sulibhavi, Madhvesh
Josh Boyer wrote on Tuesday, June 03, 2008 5:22 PM > What build issues? Ebony should build fine for 2.6.26-rc3, unless > you're trying to apply this patchset to it without the other > patches it > requires. I am trying without kprobes patches. I get build error as below

RE: [RFC] Kprobes for book-e

2008-06-03 Thread Sulibhavi, Madhvesh
> -Original Message- > From: Josh Boyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 8:17 PM > To: Sulibhavi, Madhvesh > Cc: Kumar Gala; linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > Paul Mackerras > Subject: Re: [RFC] Kprobes for book-e > A newer b

RE: [RFC] Kprobes for book-e

2008-06-09 Thread Sulibhavi, Madhvesh
Kumar Gala wrote on Tuesday, June 03, 2008 9:16 PM > To: Sulibhavi, Madhvesh > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; Paul Mackerras > Subject: Re: [RFC] Kprobes for book-e .. > > > > > I think the block code under CONFIG_BOOKE may

RE: [RFC] Kprobes for book-e

2008-06-11 Thread Sulibhavi, Madhvesh
Hi Kumar, I could switch to different version of binutils and boot the recent git for ebony target. The kprobes booke patches attached below got applied and i didnot see any issues. These patches can be now pushed to main line? Below is the revised patch set after addressing some cleanups in t

RE: [RFC] Kprobes for book-e

2008-06-12 Thread Sulibhavi, Madhvesh
Kumar Gala wrote Wednesday, June 11, 2008 8:36 PM > To: Sulibhavi, Madhvesh > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; Paul Mackerras > Subject: Re: [RFC] Kprobes for book-e > ... >

RE: [RFC] Kprobes for book-e

2008-06-17 Thread Sulibhavi, Madhvesh
Sulibhavi, Madhvesh wrote on Thursday, June 12, 2008 7:59 PM > > > static void __kprobes prepare_singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct > > > pt_regs *regs) > > > { > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_BOOKE > > > + regs->msr &= ~(MSR_EE); /* Turn off '

RE: [RFC] Kprobes for book-e

2008-06-20 Thread Sulibhavi, Madhvesh
Kumar Gala wrote on Thursday, June 19, 2008 10:15 PM > To: Sulibhavi, Madhvesh > > No!!, this code cannot be removed. My tests fail > > while doing the probe test for do_gettimeofday and __kmalloc. > > I get Oops and Segfault. I think i had got similar results > &g

RE: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/booke: Add kprobes support for booke style processors

2008-06-26 Thread Sulibhavi, Madhvesh
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org > Cc: Sulibhavi, Madhvesh > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/booke: Add kprobes support for > booke style processors > > This patch is based on work done by Madhvesh. R. Sulibhavi back in > March 2007. > > We refactor some of the single step handling since it di