On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 11:35:28AM +1000, Michael Neuling wrote:
>> Peter & Stephane,
>>
>> We are plumbing the POWER8 Branch History Rolling Buffer (BHRB) into
>> struct perf_branch_entry.
>>
>> Sometimes on POWER8 we may not be able to fill
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 08:15:17PM +1000, Michael Neuling wrote:
>> Peter,
>>
>> BTW PowerPC also has the ability to filter on conditional branches. Any
>> chance we could add something like the follow to perf also?
>>
>
> I don't see an im
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 09:32:08PM +1000, Michael Neuling wrote:
>> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
>> > Wouldn't it be mostly conditional branches that are the primary control
>> > flow
>> > and can get predicted wrong? I mean, I'm sure someone w
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Michael Neuling wrote:
> Stephane Eranian wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 09:32:08PM +1000, Michael Neuling wrote:
>> >> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> >
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 03:41:35PM +1000, Michael Neuling wrote:
>> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>
>> Can we add your signed-off-by on this?
>>
>> We are cleaning up our series for conditional branches and would like to
>> add this as part of th
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Michael Neuling wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 03:37:22PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> > On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Peter Zijlstra
>> > wrote:
>> > > We should always have pro
Hi,
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Anshuman Khandual
wrote:
> On 05/21/2013 07:25 PM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Michael Neuling wrote:
>>> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 03:37:22PM +0200, Step
onality with either HW filtering support (if present) or
> with SW filtering of instructions.
>
Reviewed-by: Stephane Eranian
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git
JCC.
>
Reviewed-by: Stephane Eranian
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c | 6 ++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
> b/arch/
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Anshuman Khandual
wrote:
> Adding documentation support for conditional branch filter.
>
Reviewed-by: Stephane Eranian
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual
> ---
> tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 inserti
Hi,
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Anshuman Khandual
wrote:
>
> This patchset is the re-spin of the original branch stack
> sampling
> patchset which introduced new PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND branch filter. This
> patchset
> also enables SW based branch filtering support for boo
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Anshuman Khandual
wrote:
> On 05/27/2014 05:39 PM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> I have been looking at those patches and ran some tests.
>> And I found a few issues so far.
>>
>> I am running:
>> $ perf record -j any_ret -e cycles:u
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Anshuman Khandual
wrote:
> On 06/02/2014 06:29 PM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Anshuman Khandual
>> wrote:
>>> On 05/27/2014 05:39 PM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>>>> I have been looking at those pa
.org/patch/539244/
>
> Would appreciate comments and feedback.
>
> Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner
> Cc: Ingo Molnar
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra
> Cc: Jiri Olsa
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> Cc: Stephane Eranian
> Cc: Russell King
> Cc: Cat
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Robert Richter wrote:
> Sukadev,
>
> On 15.10.12 17:55:34, Robert Richter wrote:
>> On 11.10.12 18:28:39, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
>> > + { .type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE, .config =
>> > PERF_COUNT_HW_STALLED_CYCLES_FIXED_POINT },
>> > + { .type = PERF_TYPE_HARDW
Generic name
>
> cmpl-stall-fxu stalled-cycles-fixed-point
> cmpl-stall-lsu stalled-cycles-load-store
> cmpl-stall-ifu stalled-cycles-instruction-fetch
> cmpl-stall-bru stalled-cycles-branch-unit
>
> But like Ste
Glad to see you fixed the PPC problem.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 03:48:22PM +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
>>
>> perf on POWER stopped working after commit e050e3f0a71b (perf: Fix
>> broken interrupt rate throttling). That patch exposed a bug
Hello Sonny,
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 02:44:38AM -0500, Sonny Rao wrote:
> Hi, I've been reading through the perfmon2 patch for 2.6.23 and it
> dawned on me that in the powerpc architecture we have the notion of
> lazy-disabling of interrupts where we don't actually disable
> interrupts unless we s
18 matches
Mail list logo
