gt;
Currently I am not able to deal with this as I am much involved in other
development.
--
Best Regards,
Piotr Zięcik.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
ms
unusable when we turn on hardware ECC.
This could be fixed by disabling spare area usage in flash filesystems but
this probably requires changes in the MTD/filesystem infrastructure.
--
Best Regards.
Piotr Zięcik
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Thursday 07 May 2009 00:39:25 Grant Likely napisał(a):
> >> 512x are enabled in the same kernel?
> >
> > Hm... both architectures look sufficiently different to me that I
> > don't see sense in trying such a thing. Do you think that needs to be
> > supported?
>
> Yes! :-) It's not hard to do and
lock-frequency'
property in i2c node. Comments in code suggest that this behaviour is left
for backward compatibility only. Should I make the 'clock-frequency'
property mandatory for a new type of I2C controller (MPC5121) ?
--
Best Regards.
Piotr Zięcik
___
DTS file might be changed to use clock-frequency.
In my opinion implementing "backward compatilility" for MPC5121 is not good
idea. MPC5121 I2C support is completly new thing in mainline. Simply, there is
no DTS with which I have to be compatible. Adding backward co
New one uses
existing infrastructure which makes DMA engine aviable for existing consumers
in Linux kernel. For example network stack. Support for I/O <-> memory
transfers will be added when more consumers arrive.
--
Best Regards.
Piotr Zięcik
___
Li
Tuesday 19 May 2009 00:17:31 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> We are close to the point where we can make this a runtime option
> though, by just having a different set of dma_ops hooked in.
>
Is somebody currently working on it? If yes, where we can see
code ?
--
Best Regards.
Thursday 14 May 2009 16:00:33 Grant Likely wrote:
> > MPC5121 support was added to drivers/net/fs_enet. MPC52xx uses
> > drivers/net/fec_mpc52xx.c. Do you think that creating one universal
> > driver from these two is now possible? You said that it should be easy,
> > however you also said that cac
