Hi Ben,
> On May 2, 2015, at 01:57 , Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 13:46 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 07:54 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>
The difference seems to be whe
Hi Ben,
Sorry for taking this long to respond, but I am working on the same problem
right
now. I thought I might have something to show, but not yet :)
My PCI overlay case is different. In my case there is no firmware and there
is the blob is provided as an overlay.
The idea is that for a given
Hi Ben,
> On May 14, 2015, at 09:46 , Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2015-05-14 at 09:23 +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>
>>> A few things that I don't find in the overlay code (but maybe I haven't
>>> looked at it hard enough)
Hi Ben,
> On May 14, 2015, at 10:14 , Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2015-05-14 at 10:04 +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>
>> Hmm, since you just want to transmit a whole subtree things are a bit
>> simpler.
>>
>> You don’t need any of th
Hi Ben,
> On May 14, 2015, at 10:25 , Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2015-05-14 at 10:19 +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>
>>
>> You don’t want to know how sausages are made, but they are delicious :)
>
> ... most of the time :)
>
>>
Hi Ben,
> On May 14, 2015, at 10:47 , Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> wrote:
>
[snip]
So I spend some time thinking about your use case and I think it boils down
to this:
I have a live tree in the firmware, I have made changes and I need to reflect
those changes to the live tree in the kernel.
Sou
Hi Grant,
CCing Thomas Gleixner & Steven Rostedt, since they might have a few
ideas...
On Jun 18, 2014, at 11:07 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> Hi Nathan and Tyrel,
>
> I'm looking into lifecycle issues on nodes modified by OF_DYNAMIC, and
> I'm hoping you can help me. Right now, pseries seems to be
Hi Grant,
On Jun 23, 2014, at 5:58 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 11:33:20 +0300, Pantelis Antoniou
> wrote:
>> Hi Grant,
>>
>> CCing Thomas Gleixner & Steven Rostedt, since they might have a few
>> ideas...
>>
>> On Jun 18, 201
On 06/23/2014 09:58 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 11:33:20 +0300, Pantelis Antoniou
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Grant,
>>>>>>
[snip]
>>
>> This would affect property updates. When doing a property update the
&g
urned immediately. So it
> doesn't look like accessing sysfs attributes actually takes a reference
> to the underlying i2c_adapter."
>
> Let's get rid of this code before really nobody knows/understands
> anymore what this was for and if it has a subtle use.
>
On 28 Μαϊ 2008, at 11:36 ΠΜ, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm happy to say that __raw is purely about ordering and make them
byteswap on powerpc tho (ie, make them little endian like the non-
raw
counterpart).
That would break a lot of drivers
On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 10:44 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Alan Tull wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Frank Rowand
> > wrote:
> >> On 10/17/17 14:46, Rob Herring wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Alan Tull wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017
Hi Frank,
> On Oct 19, 2017, at 00:46 , Frank Rowand wrote:
>
> On 10/18/17 11:30, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 10:44 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 a
Hi Rob,
> On Oct 18, 2017, at 21:30 , Rob Herring wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 10:44 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Alan Tull wrote:
>>>> On Tue
Hi Frank,
> On Oct 20, 2017, at 00:46 , Frank Rowand wrote:
>
> On 10/19/17 13:06, Moritz Fischer wrote:
>
> < snip >
>
>> We also have plenty of code that is just not aware of overlays, and
>> assumes certain parts of the tree to stay static.
>
> I would state that somewhat differently. :-)
15 matches
Mail list logo
