On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 21:54:01 -0500, Kumar Gala
wrote:
>> #define TARGET_85xx
>> +#define TARGET_HAS_ETH3
>
> This is problematic in that we'd be changing the memory layout of the
> bd_t and not ALL 85xx's have HAS_ETH3 set.
It shouldn't be problematic. The bi_enet3addr field is at the end of
On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 17:35 +0200, Sebastian Siewior wrote:
> If you don't mind, I would prefer having ISP1760_FLAG_BUS_WIDTH_32 and
> or conditionally HW_DATA_BUS_32BIT.
It doesn't matter much to me -- I just reasoned that a 32-bit bus width
was the norm since it's the hardware default and so hav
