Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] sched: BUG when stack end location is over written

2014-09-12 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Fri, 2014-09-12 at 10:44 +0100, Aaron Tomlin wrote: > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 02:06:57PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 16:41 +0100, Aaron Tomlin wrote: > > > diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug > > > index a285900..2a8280a 100644 > > > --- a/lib/Kconfig

Re: CONFIG_NO_HZ causing poor console responsiveness

2010-07-01 Thread Mike Galbraith
eca1 > c9494727cf293ae2ec66af57547a3e79c724fec2 > We cannot bisect more! > > These correspond to a batch of scheduler patches, most from Mike Galbraith. > > I don't know what to do now. I can't test any of these commits. Even > if I could, they look l

Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] preempt/dynamic: Introduce preempt mode accessors

2021-11-10 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Wed, 2021-11-10 at 20:24 +, Valentin Schneider wrote: > > diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h > index 5f8db54226af..0640d5622496 100644 > --- a/include/linux/sched.h > +++ b/include/linux/sched.h > @@ -2073,6 +2073,22 @@ static inline void cond_resched_rcu(void) >  #en

Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] preempt/dynamic: Introduce preempt mode accessors

2021-11-10 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Thu, 2021-11-11 at 04:16 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Wed, 2021-11-10 at 20:24 +, Valentin Schneider wrote: > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h > > index 5f8db54226af..0640d5622496 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/sched.h >

Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] preempt/dynamic: Introduce preempt mode accessors

2021-11-10 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Thu, 2021-11-11 at 04:35 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Thu, 2021-11-11 at 04:16 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Wed, 2021-11-10 at 20:24 +, Valentin Schneider wrote: > > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h > > > ind

Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] preempt/dynamic: Introduce preempt mode accessors

2021-11-10 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Thu, 2021-11-11 at 04:47 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > So I suppose the powerpc spot should remain CONFIG_PREEMPT and become > CONFIG_PREEMPTION when the RT change gets merged, because that spot is > about full preemptibility, not a distinct preemption model. KCSAN needs a littl

Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] preempt/dynamic: Introduce preempt mode accessors

2021-11-11 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Thu, 2021-11-11 at 10:36 +0100, Marco Elver wrote: > On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 at 04:47, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2021-11-11 at 04:35 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > On Thu, 2021-11-11 at 04:16 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2021-11-1

Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] preempt/dynamic: Introduce preempt mode accessors

2021-11-11 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Thu, 2021-11-11 at 10:56 +, Valentin Schneider wrote: > On 11/11/21 11:32, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Thu, 2021-11-11 at 10:36 +0100, Marco Elver wrote: > > > I guess the question is if is_preempt_full() should be true also if > > > is_preempt_rt() i

Re: [tip:sched/core] sched/core: Add debugging code to catch missing update_rq_clock() calls

2017-01-31 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Tue, 2017-01-31 at 16:30 +0530, Sachin Sant wrote: > Trimming the cc list. > > > > I assume I should be worried? > > > > Thanks for the report. No need to worry, the bug has existed for a > > while, this patch just turns on the warning ;-) > > > > The following commit queued up in tip/sched/c

Re: [tip:sched/core] sched/core: Add debugging code to catch missing update_rq_clock() calls

2017-02-02 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Thu, 2017-02-02 at 16:55 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 10:22:47AM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 4:48 AM, Mike Galbraith > > wrote: > > > On Tue, 2017-01-31 at 16:30 +0530, Sachin Sant wrote: > > > Could some o

Re: [tip:sched/core] sched/core: Add debugging code to catch missing update_rq_clock() calls

2017-02-03 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 09:53 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 10:03:14AM +0530, Sachin Sant wrote: > > I ran few cycles of cpu hot(un)plug tests. In most cases it works except one > > where I ran into rcu stall: > > > > [ 173.493453] INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/t

Re: [tip:sched/core] sched/core: Add debugging code to catch missing update_rq_clock() calls

2017-02-03 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 14:37 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 01:59:34PM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > FWIW, I'm not seeing stalls/hangs while beating hotplug up in tip. (so > > next grew a wart?) > > I've seen it on tip. It looks like h

Re: [PATCH 00/13] mmu_notifier kill invalidate_page callback

2017-08-30 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Tue, 2017-08-29 at 20:56 -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 05:11:24PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > People - *especially* the people who saw issues under KVM - can you > > try out Jérôme's patch-series? I aded some people to the cc, the full > > series is on lkml. Jérôm

Re: [patch] Re: [PowerPC][Linux-next][6.11.0-rc4-next-20240820] OOPs while running LTP FS Stress

2024-09-19 Thread Mike Galbraith
ted-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote Tested-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith --- kernel/sched/fair.c |9 ++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -6049,10 +6049,13 @@ void unthrottle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq

[patch] Re: [PowerPC][Linux-next][6.11.0-rc4-next-20240820] OOPs while running LTP FS Stress

2024-09-19 Thread Mike Galbraith
can proceed as it would have sans DELAY_DEQUEUE treatment. Fixes: 152e11f6df29 ("sched/fair: Implement delayed dequeue") Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 10 +++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@