microwatt_defconfig broken: fined reference to `hash__tlb_flush'

Hi! My CI builds showed that the microwatt_defconfig broke somewhere between (upstream Linus) 6d796c50f84ca79f1722bb131799e5a5710c4700 (last known good, log at [1]) and 033c40a89f55525139fd5b6342281b09b97d05bf (first known bad, log at [2]) with this: [...] make V=1 ARCH=powerpc CROSS_COMPILE=powe

Re: microwatt_defconfig broken: fined reference to `hash__tlb_flush'

On Fri, 2023-02-17 19:44:27 +, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > Le 17/02/2023 à 18:14, Jan-Benedict Glaw a écrit : > > Hi! > > > > My CI builds showed that the microwatt_defconfig broke somewhere between > > (upstream Linus) 6d796c50f84ca79f1722bb131799e5a571

Re: microwatt_defconfig broken: fined reference to `hash__tlb_flush'

Hi Christophe! On Fri, 2023-02-17 21:00:43 +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > On Fri, 2023-02-17 19:44:27 +, Christophe Leroy > wrote: > > Le 17/02/2023 à 18:14, Jan-Benedict Glaw a écrit : > > > My CI builds showed that the microwatt_defconfig broke somewhere between

Re: microwatt_defconfig broken: fined reference to `hash__tlb_flush'

Hi! On Fri, 2023-02-17 19:44:27 +, Christophe Leroy wrote: > Le 17/02/2023 à 18:14, Jan-Benedict Glaw a écrit : > > My CI builds showed that the microwatt_defconfig broke somewhere between > > (upstream Linus) 6d796c50f84ca79f1722bb131799e5a5710c4700 (last known good, &g

Mass-building defconfigs: many fail with assembler errors

Hi! Is anybody else routinely building current Binutils + GCC, to try to build all the Linux defconfigs? For PPC, a good number of those fail, and I probably don't understand PPC well enough to propose patches. Or did I pick wrongly targeted toolchains? Most of the time, my suspicion is that we'r

Re: Mass-building defconfigs: many fail with assembler errors

Hi Michael, On Tue, 2022-12-13 14:49:20 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Jan-Benedict Glaw writes: > > Is anybody else routinely building current Binutils + GCC, to try to > > build all the Linux defconfigs? > > I did for several years, but eventually stopped because it

Re: Mass-building defconfigs: many fail with assembler errors

Hi Segher! On Mon, 2022-12-12 18:26:13 -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 10:51:17PM +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: [...] > > For PPC, a good number of those fail, > > and I probably don't understand PPC well enough to propose patches. Or > > d

Re: Mass-building defconfigs: many fail with assembler errors

Hi Segher! On Tue, 2022-12-13 11:00:45 +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > On Mon, 2022-12-12 18:26:13 -0600, Segher Boessenkool > wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 10:51:17PM +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > > > Compiler ICEs (during GIMPLE pass: ccp) in align.c: >

Re: Mass-building defconfigs: many fail with assembler errors

On Tue, 2022-12-13 14:49:20 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: [...] > Both treeboot-akebono.c and treeboot-currituck.c are for 476 so should > probably be built with -mcpu=476. eg: > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile > index d32d95aea5d6..acb6eddace8f 100644 > --

Re: Mass-building defconfigs: many fail with assembler errors

Hi Segher! On Wed, 2022-12-14 10:00:25 +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > On Tue, 2022-12-13 11:00:45 +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw > wrote: > > On Mon, 2022-12-12 18:26:13 -0600, Segher Boessenkool > > wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 10:51:17PM +01

Re: Mass-building defconfigs: many fail with assembler errors

On Wed, 2022-12-14 10:00:25 +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > On Tue, 2022-12-13 11:00:45 +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw > wrote: > > On Mon, 2022-12-12 18:26:13 -0600, Segher Boessenkool > > wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 10:51:17PM +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrot

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Pass correct CPU reference to assembler

On Fri, 2022-12-16 16:07:25 +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > Hi Christophe, > > I love your patch! Yet something to improve: [...] > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable > | Reported-by: kernel test robot > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > >Assembler