440EPx - SPI and IIC1 conflict

2008-05-15 Thread Gary Jennejohn
Right now the SPI driver is initialized before the i2c driver, but I'm not certain that this would be the case for all time. Basically I'm wondering whether anyone on this list has any brilliant idea for handling this problem or whether my pres

Re: [PATCH 3/4] spi: Add OF binding support for SPI busses

2008-05-19 Thread Gary Jennejohn
f I'm wrong. So the driver has great gobs of GPIO code in it, most of which I took from u-boot. The code is pretty generic, but some 440EPx-specific stuff may have crept in without my being aware of it. My real question is - should this code be in a platform-specific file such as sequoia.

[PATCH] Correct the size of reg in the spi@ entry to 7.

2008-05-19 Thread Gary Jennejohn
This is needed because there is a one byte gap between SR and CDM. Signed-off-by: Gary Jennejohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- arch/powerpc/boot/dts/yosemite.dts |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/yosemite.dts b/arch/powerpc/bo

Re: [PATCH 3/4] spi: Add OF binding support for SPI busses

2008-05-20 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Mon, 19 May 2008 21:19:50 +0400 Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 07:09:00PM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote: [snip extraneous content] > > My problem was, and is, that there's no generic GPIO support for powerpc. > > At least, not that