e
> of
> > edac_device_ctl_info structure at the same time. The
> index allocation
> > for these structures should be taken care of by EDAC
> core.
> >
>
> From: Andrew Morton
>
> keep things neat. Also avoids having global
> identifier device_index
&g
Ok, is this the one you want me to push upstream?
doug t
--- On Thu, 7/9/09, Ira W. Snyder wrote:
From: Ira W. Snyder
Subject: [PATCH v2] edac: mpc85xx: add support for mpc83xx memory controller
To: bluesmoke-de...@lists.sourceforge.net, "Dave Jiang" ,
"Kumar Gala" , linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org
Ira or Kumar,
can you address Andrew's concerns below and what was posted in prior posts on
this?
thanks
doug t
--- On Wed, 7/15/09, Andrew Morton wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] edac: mpc85xx add mpc83xx support
> To: dougthomp...@xmission.com
> Cc: bluesmoke-de...
I assume then that this patch will move upstream via the POWERPC path, is that
right?
Signed-off-by: Doug Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Olof Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [POWERPC] pasemi: Broaden specific references to 1682M
>
> There will be more p
AC to log a correct syndrome code to make problem investigation
> > easier.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maxim Shchetynin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Doug Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ---
> > drivers/ed
Dave Jiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There's an SVN+quilt tree via sourceforge
for EDAC. I have asked Doug to push
this patch upstream to the mm tree.
Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Sep 19, 2008, at 6:20 PM, Nate Case wrote:
>
>> From: Andrew Kilkenny
>>
>> This adds support for the dual-core MP
c_mc) devices for chipsets now, but via the new edac_device
class, such things
as ECC error tracking on DMA error checkers, FABRIC switchs, L1 and L2 cache
ECC events, core CPU
data ECC checkers, etc can be done. I have an out of kernel tree MIPS driver do
just this. Other
types of harvesters ca
--- Linas Vepstas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 03:47:05PM -0700, Doug Thompson wrote:
> >
> > --- Linas Vepstas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Also: please note that the linux kernel has a pci error recovery
> > > mechanism
