Hi Hans, Milton, Jean,
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 12:31 AM, Hans de Goede <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jean Delvare wrote:
>> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:27:26 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> Jean Delvare wrote:
Hi Hans, hi Milton,
>>>
>>>
> One could make a superio driver, and create sub-d
Hi Hans,
>> I propose writing a subsystem driver. (Is that properly called "The
>> SuperIO Bus Driver"?) If no one thinks it's a really bad idea I will
>> put together some code and submit it for review, and maintain it.
>>
>> Some hwmon chips have odd / unique probe sequences. IMHO this is where
Hi Hans,
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Hans de Goede <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Milton Miller wrote:
>> I haven't done the research, but it might be keep superio as
>> a platform driver, and keep the clients as platform drivers. Only
>> have the superio driver probe and discover the subcomp
Hi Jean,
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 2:36 AM, Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is there any way to use lspci and start at the LPC bridge, then find
>> the SuperIO chip's IO address? What about ACPI tables? Perhaps probing
>> logic could look for an LPC bridge before probing certain IO addres
