On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:44:31AM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Also, I would like to see the test results reports using
> > kselftest.h - it can be separate patch in the interest of
> > getting tests in.
>
> Sorry but kselftest.h doesn't do anything useful for us.
>
> We have exist
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:31:47PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> My overall take on the fault-injection code is that there has been a
> disappointing amount of uptake: I don't see many developers using them
> for whitebox testing their stuff. I guess this patchset addresses
> that, in a way.
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 09:20:46AM -0800, Ira W. Snyder wrote:
> > > +static DEVICE_ATTR(enable, S_IWUGO | S_IRUGO, data_en_show,
> > > data_en_set);
> >
> > Are all of these really needed or most of them are for debug?
> >
>
> Most are for debugging. They have proved useful a few times
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 03:12:56PM +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> What about drivers/cpufreq/powerpc, or it's an unnecessary?
We haven't done it so far for x86 & arm, so for now at least, just keeping
them in drivers/cpufreq/ should be sufficient.
> Should I resumbit it, or there will
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 01:28:30PM +1000, Ben Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Before I comment on this last one, a quick Q. for Dave: Do you want to
> handle this or should I merge it via powerpc.git ? (It depends on
> another change to the arch code to expose the SCOM functions that it
> uses, and that
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 01:23:03PM -0500, kevin diggs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
> wrote:
> >
> > drivers/cpufreq/powerpc. However my current version (as suggested by Ben)
> > goes directly to drivers/cpufreq
> >
> Uh ... Just curious ... wh
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 07:52:45PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> No idea who to bother with this and maybe it's just a
> misconfiguration... Apologies if my guesses are totally wrong.
>
> I'm currently on 2.6.24-rc3 (+wireless-2.6#everything) but couldn't find
> any patches between
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 05:53:43PM +0100, Thomas Klein wrote:
> +static void ehea_update_adapter_handles(struct ehea_adapter *adapter)
> +{
> +int i, k;
> +int j = 0;
> +
> +memset(adapter->res_handles, sizeof(adapter->res_handles), 0);
arguments wrong way around.
Dave
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 05:02:30PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Christian Krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This patch adds a cpufreq governor that takes the number of running spus
> into account. It's very similar to the ondemand governor, but not as complex.
> Instead of hacking spu loa
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 08:43:43AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 07 July 2008, Dave Jones wrote:
> > One question I do have though, is how userspace scripts are supposed
> > to know they're to echo cbe_spu_governor into the relevant parts of
> > sysfs. I&#
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 01:41:38PM +1000, Ben Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 11:27 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 08:43:43AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Monday 07 July 2008, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > > One question I do
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 03:18:59PM +1000, Ben Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 17:02 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > From: Christian Krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > This patch adds a cpufreq governor that takes the number of running spus
> > into account. It's very similar to t
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:34:03AM +1000, Ben Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Linus,
>
> I apologize in advance for the couple of merge commits in there. I
> merged your tree yesterday in order to fix a (fairly minor) conflict,
> and waited for our autobuilder to test a whole bunch of configs
> overn
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 04:47:23PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 08:39:12AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > If we don't enable FS_ENET we get build issues:
> >
> > arch/powerpc/platforms/built-in.o: In function `ep8248e_mdio_probe':
> > arch/powerpc/platforms/82xx/ep8248e.c:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 05:10:29PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Jul 16, 2008, at 4:57 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 04:47:23PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 08:39:12AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >>> If
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 10:25:20AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus, Alan,
>
> Today's linux-next (actually just Linus' tree) build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/serial/serial_txx9.c: In function 'receive_chars':
> drivers/serial/serial_txx9.c:275: erro
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 03:02:19AM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 06:28:15PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > Hi Anton,
> > I tried reenabling CONFIG_MTD_NAND_FSL_UPM in the Fedora kernel
> > today (currently on 2.6.27-rc9-git
17 matches
Mail list logo
