Hi Kees,
On 2024-05-08 10:11:35+, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 08:12:34PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 09:54:35 +0200 Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > > The series was split from my larger series sysctl-const series [0].
> > > It only focusses on the proc_handl
Currently in some cases, when the sampled instruction address register
latches to a specific address during sampling, there is an inconsistency
in the privilege bits captured in the sampled event register.
For example, a snippet from the perf report on a power10 system is:
Overhead Address
On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 10:38:30AM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 10:27 AM Shengjiu Wang
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 1:14 AM Conor Dooley wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 10:57:38AM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> > > > Add two PLL clock sources, they
(2024-02-04)
> ...
> Booting Linux via __start() @ 0x0480 ...
> Hello World !
> smp_core99_probe
> smp_core99_bringup_done
> Starting system log daemon: syslogd, klogd.
Here is a freshly generated image using kernel 6.7.12 as the installer kernel:
> https://cdimage.debian.o
Hi Anjali,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on dd5a440a31fae6e459c0d627162825505361]
url:
https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Anjali-K/powerpc-perf-set-cpumode-flags-using-sample-address-in-the-PPMU_ARCH_31-case/20240511-202416