Le 14/12/2022 à 05:42, Nicholas Miehlbradt a écrit :
> Walks the stack when copy_{to,from}_user address is in the stack to
> ensure that the object being copied is entirely within a single stack
> frame.
>
> Substatially similar to the x86 implementation except using the back
> chain to traverse
Hi Segher!
On Tue, 2022-12-13 11:00:45 +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-12-12 18:26:13 -0600, Segher Boessenkool
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 10:51:17PM +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > > Compiler ICEs (during GIMPLE pass: ccp) in align.c:
> > >
> > > powerpc-lin
On Wed Dec 14, 2022 at 6:39 PM AEST, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
>
> Le 14/12/2022 à 05:42, Nicholas Miehlbradt a écrit :
> > Walks the stack when copy_{to,from}_user address is in the stack to
> > ensure that the object being copied is entirely within a single stack
> > frame.
> >
> > Substatially
Le 14/12/2022 à 12:39, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
> On Wed Dec 14, 2022 at 6:39 PM AEST, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>
>>
>> Le 14/12/2022 à 05:42, Nicholas Miehlbradt a écrit :
>>> Walks the stack when copy_{to,from}_user address is in the stack to
>>> ensure that the object being copied is entirely
Le 14/12/2022 à 12:48, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
Le 14/12/2022 à 12:39, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
On Wed Dec 14, 2022 at 6:39 PM AEST, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Le 14/12/2022 à 05:42, Nicholas Miehlbradt a écrit :
Walks the stack when copy_{to,from}_user address is in the stack to
ensure
Commit c9bfcb315104 ("spi_mpc83xx: much improved driver") made
modifications to the driver to not perform speed changes while
chipselect is active. But those changes where lost with the
convertion to tranfer_one.
Previous implementation was allowing speed changes during
message transfer when cs_ch
On Tue, 2022-12-13 14:49:20 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
[...]
> Both treeboot-akebono.c and treeboot-currituck.c are for 476 so should
> probably be built with -mcpu=476. eg:
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile
> index d32d95aea5d6..acb6eddace8f 100644
> --
Le 13/12/2022 à 21:25, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 07:03:07PM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> In binutils 2.35, 'nm -D' changed to show symbol versions along with
>> symbol names, with the usual @@ separator.
>
> 2.37 instead? And --without-symbol-versions is there
Em Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 03:21:03PM +0530, Athira Rajeev escreveu:
> > On 13-Dec-2022, at 12:27 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> > wrote:
> > Em Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 12:27:01PM +0530, Athira Rajeev escreveu:
> >>> On 28-Oct-2022, at 9:12 PM, Kajol Jain wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Perf BPF filter test fails
tree/branch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
branch HEAD: 663397d1b469ff57f216d499b74a0b0183a508b8 Add linux-next specific
files for 20221214
Error/Warning reports:
https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202211242120.mzzvguln-...@intel.com
https
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 01:22:40PM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet
>
> [ Upstream commit 62c07983bef9d3e78e71189441e1a470f0d1e653 ]
>
> Christophe Leroy reported a ~80ms latency spike
> happening at first TCP connect() time.
>
> This is because __inet_hash_connect() uses get
Hi Segher!
On Wed, 2022-12-14 10:00:25 +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-12-13 11:00:45 +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2022-12-12 18:26:13 -0600, Segher Boessenkool
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 10:51:17PM +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > > >
On Wed, 14 Dec 2022 14:41:33 +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Commit c9bfcb315104 ("spi_mpc83xx: much improved driver") made
> modifications to the driver to not perform speed changes while
> chipselect is active. But those changes where lost with the
> convertion to tranfer_one.
>
> Previous impl
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 03:33:24PM +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Le 13/12/2022 à 21:25, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 07:03:07PM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> >> In binutils 2.35, 'nm -D' changed to show symbol versions along with
> >> symbol names, with the usual @
On 06.12.22 15:47, David Hildenbrand wrote:
This is the follow-up on [1]:
[PATCH v2 0/8] mm: COW fixes part 3: reliable GUP R/W FOLL_GET of
anonymous pages
After we implemented __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE on most prominent
enterprise architectures, implement __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SWP
Hi Christophe,
On Wed, 14 Dec 2022 14:41:33 +0100
Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Commit c9bfcb315104 ("spi_mpc83xx: much improved driver") made
> modifications to the driver to not perform speed changes while
> chipselect is active. But those changes where lost with the
> convertion to tranfer_one.
>
Hi!
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 07:36:32PM +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> So we have these remaining build issues:
>
> linux-powerpc-cell_defconfig bad asm
> (arch/powerpc/boot/pseries-head.S)
> linux-powerpc-mvme5100_defconfig bad asm
> (arch/powerpc/kernel/epapr_hcalls.S)
> lin
On 2022-12-13 02:29, Christophe Leroy wrote:
The changes are absolutely not specific to powerpc. You should adjust
the subject accordingly, and copy linux-arch and tracing and probably
also ia64 and parisc.
I was hoping to get feedback from the PPC maintainers before posting something
more wid
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 09:39:25PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> What about just copying x86's implementation including using
> __builtin_frame_address(1/2)? Are those builtins reliable for all
> our targets and compiler versions?
__builtin_frame_address(n) with n > 0 is specifically not support
On Thu Dec 15, 2022 at 10:17 AM AEST, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 09:39:25PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > What about just copying x86's implementation including using
> > __builtin_frame_address(1/2)? Are those builtins reliable for all
> > our targets and compiler vers
Le 14/12/2022 à 15:45, Jan-Benedict Glaw a écrit :
> On Tue, 2022-12-13 14:49:20 +1100, Michael Ellerman
> wrote:
> [...]
>> Both treeboot-akebono.c and treeboot-currituck.c are for 476 so should
>> probably be built with -mcpu=476. eg:
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile b/arch/power
Le 15/12/2022 à 07:49, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
>
>
> Le 14/12/2022 à 15:45, Jan-Benedict Glaw a écrit :
>> On Tue, 2022-12-13 14:49:20 +1100, Michael Ellerman
>> wrote:
>> [...]
>>> Both treeboot-akebono.c and treeboot-currituck.c are for 476 so should
>>> probably be built with -mcpu=476.
22 matches
Mail list logo