On Thu, 04 Aug 2022 18:05:56 -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
> This adds a binding for the SerDes module found on QorIQ processors.
> Each phy is a subnode of the top-level device, possibly supporting
> multiple lanes and protocols. This "thick" #phy-cells is used due to
> allow for better organization
On 8/5/22 2:53 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 05/08/2022 00:05, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> This adds ids for the Lynx 10g SerDes's internal PLLs. These may be used
>> witn assigned-clock* to specify a particular frequency to use.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v4
On 8/5/22 10:09 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Aug 2022 18:05:56 -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> This adds a binding for the SerDes module found on QorIQ processors.
>> Each phy is a subnode of the top-level device, possibly supporting
>> multiple lanes and protocols. This "thick" #phy-cells
Le 25/07/2022 à 08:24, Rohan McLure a écrit :
> Arch-specific implementations of syscall handlers are currently used
> over generic implementations for the following reasons:
>
> 1. Semantics unique to powerpc
> 2. Compatibility syscalls require 'argument padding' to comply with
> 64-bi
Le 25/07/2022 à 08:26, Rohan McLure a écrit :
> Syscall #82 has been implemented for 32-bit platforms in a unique way on
> powerpc systems. This hack will in effect guess whether the caller is
> expecting new select semantics or old select semantics. It does so via a
> guess, based off the first
Le 25/07/2022 à 08:30, Rohan McLure a écrit :
> Implement syscall wrapper as per s390, x86, arm64. When enabled
> cause handlers to accept parameters from a stack frame rather than
> from user scratch register state. This allows for user registers to be
> safely cleared in order to reduce caller
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (master)
by Jakub Kicinski :
On Wed, 3 Aug 2022 10:52:46 -0500 you wrote:
> Add Nick Child as the maintainer of the IBM Power Virtual Ethernet
> Device Driver, replacing Cristobal Forno.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Child
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Linus,
Please pull powerpc updates for 6.0.
There's one trivial conflict between the removal of CONFIG_ARCH_RANDOM and a
whitespace
change on our side.
There also will be a conflict in some powerpc code when you merge the bitmap
tree, details
On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 12:30:38 +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Commit 4d5c5bad5193 ("powerpc: Remove asm/prom.h from asm/mpc52xx.h
> and asm/pci.h") that cleans up powerpc's asm/prom.h leads to build
> errors in ppc4xx_edac.c due to missing header. Include required
> header directly to avoid the buil
On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 20:57:23 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> The recent change to the PHB numbering logic has a logic error in the
> handling of "ibm,opal-phbid".
>
> When an "ibm,opal-phbid" property is present, &prop is written to and
> ret is set to zero.
>
> The following call to of_alias_get
On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 09:57:47 +0800, zhouzho...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Zhouyi Zhou
>
> In ppc 64, invoke jump_label_init in setup_feature_keys is too late
> because static key will be used in subroutine of parse_early_param
> which is again subroutine of early_init_devtree.
>
> So we invoke jum
On Wed, 3 Aug 2022 16:31:52 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> When building ppc64_book3e_allmodconfig the build fails with:
>
> arch/powerpc/kexec/file_load_64.c:1063:14: error: implicit declaration of
> function ‘firmware_has_feature’
>1063 | if (!firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_LPA
12 matches
Mail list logo
