-Original Message-
From: Athira Rajeev
To: a...@kernel.org, jo...@kernel.org
Cc: m...@ellerman.id.au, linux-perf-us...@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, ma...@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
rnsas...@linux.ibm.com, kj...@linux.ibm.com, disg...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
, irog...@google.com
-Original Message-
From: Athira Rajeev
To: a...@kernel.org, jo...@kernel.org
Cc: m...@ellerman.id.au, linux-perf-us...@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, ma...@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
rnsas...@linux.ibm.com, kj...@linux.ibm.com, disg...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
, irog...@google.com
Le 12/05/2022 à 09:45, Hari Bathini a écrit :
> This adds two atomic opcodes BPF_XCHG and BPF_CMPXCHG on ppc32, both
> of which include the BPF_FETCH flag. The kernel's atomic_cmpxchg
> operation fundamentally has 3 operands, but we only have two register
> fields. Therefore the operand we compa
Le 10/05/2022 à 14:37, Alexander Graf a écrit :
> Commit 863771a28e27 ("powerpc/32s: Convert switch_mmu_context() to C")
> moved the switch_mmu_context() to C. While in principle a good idea, it
> meant that the function now uses the stack. The stack is not accessible
> from real mode though.
>
On Wed, 2022-05-11 at 17:22 -0300, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> On 10/05/2022 11:28, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > [...]
> > It is not clear to me why user mode linux should not care about
> > the other notifiers. It might be because I do not know much
> > about the user mode linux.
> >
> > Is the becau
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 03:04:14AM +, Tong Tiangen wrote:
> During the processing of arm64 kernel hardware memory errors(do_sea()), if
> the errors is consumed in the kernel, the current processing is panic.
> However, it is not optimal.
>
> Take uaccess for example, if the uaccess operation f
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 03:04:15AM +, Tong Tiangen wrote:
> Add copy_{to, from}_user() to machine check safe.
>
> If copy fail due to hardware memory error, only the relevant processes are
> affected, so killing the user process and isolate the user page with
> hardware memory errors is a more
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 03:04:16AM +, Tong Tiangen wrote:
> From: Robin Murphy
>
> Invoking user_ldst to explicitly add a post-increment of 0 is silly.
> Just use a normal USER() annotation and save the redundant instruction.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy
> Reviewed-by: Tong Tiangen
Whe
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 03:04:17AM +, Tong Tiangen wrote:
> Add {get, put}_user() to machine check safe.
>
> If get/put fail due to hardware memory error, only the relevant processes
> are affected, so killing the user process and isolate the user page with
> hardware memory errors is a more r
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 03:04:18AM +, Tong Tiangen wrote:
> In the cow(copy on write) processing, the data of the user process is
> copied, when hardware memory error is encountered during copy, only the
> relevant processes are affected, so killing the user process and isolate
> the user page
On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 11:12:20PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, May 05 2022 at 16:59, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > Vectors are meaningless when allocating IRQs with NMI as the delivery
> > mode.
>
> Vectors are not meaningless. NMI has a fixed vector.
>
> The point is that for a fixed vecto
On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 11:23:23PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, May 05 2022 at 16:59, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > The Intel IOMMU interrupt remapping driver already programs correctly the
> > delivery mode of individual irqs as per their irq_data. Improve handling
> > of NMIs. Allow only one
On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 11:26:22PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, May 05 2022 at 16:59, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> >
> > + if (info->flags & X86_IRQ_ALLOC_AS_NMI) {
> > + /* Only one IRQ per NMI */
> > + if (nr_irqs != 1)
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> See
On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 11:31:56PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, May 05 2022 at 16:59, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > +*
> > +* Also, NMIs do not have an associated vector. No need for cleanup.
>
> They have a vector and what the heck is this cleanup comment for here?
> There is nothing
On Fri, May 13 2022 at 11:03, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 11:12:20PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> Why would a NMI ever end up in this code? There is no vector management
>> required and this find cpu exercise is pointless.
>
> But even if the NMI has a fixed vector, it is stil
On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 11:41:13PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, May 05 2022 at 16:59, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > Programming an HPET channel as periodic requires setting the
> > HPET_TN_SETVAL bit in the channel configuration. Plus, the comparator
> > register must be written twice (once fo
On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 11:51:52PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, May 06 2022 at 23:41, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Thu, May 05 2022 at 16:59, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> >> Programming an HPET channel as periodic requires setting the
> >> HPET_TN_SETVAL bit in the channel configuration. Plus,
On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 04:03:39PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, May 05 2022 at 17:00, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > + if (is_hpet_hld_interrupt(hdata)) {
> > + /*
> > +* Kick the timer first. If the HPET channel is periodic, it
> > +* helps to reduce the del
On Wednesday 02 March 2022 15:44:05 Ash Logan wrote:
> pgtable_32.c:mapin_ram loops over each valid memory range, which means
> non-contiguous memory just works.
Hello! Does it mean that non-contiguous memory works for any 32-bit
powerpc platform, and not only for wiiu? If yes, should not be
non-c
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 08:38:22PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Excerpts from Ricardo Neri's message of May 6, 2022 9:59 am:
> > Certain implementations of the hardlockup detector require support for
> > Inter-Processor Interrupt shorthands. On x86, support for these can only
> > be determined a
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 08:46:41PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Excerpts from Ricardo Neri's message of May 6, 2022 10:00 am:
> > Prepare hardlockup_panic_setup() to handle a comma-separated list of
> > options. Thus, it can continue parsing its own command-line options while
> > ignoring parame
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 10:50:09PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, May 13 2022 at 11:03, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 11:12:20PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> Why would a NMI ever end up in this code? There is no vector management
> >> required and this find cpu exer
22 matches
Mail list logo
