From: Balbir Singh
The CPPR (Current Processor Priority Register) of a XICS interrupt
presentation controller contains a value N, such that only interrupts
with a priority "more favoured" than N will be received by the CPU,
where "more favoured" means "less than". So if the CPPR has the value 5
t
Jiri Slaby writes:
> There is code duplicated over all architecture's headers for
> futex_atomic_op_inuser. Namely op decoding, access_ok check for uaddr,
> and comparison of the result.
>
> Remove this duplication and leave up to the arches only the needed
> assembly which is now in arch_futex_a
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 01:27:10PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/futex.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/futex.h
> index 6795368ad023..cc414382dab4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/futex.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/futex.h
> @@ -128,20 +128,10 @@ futex_atomic_cmpxchg_ina
On 03/04/17 05:05, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>
>> +static int futex_atomic_op_inuser(int encoded_op, u32 __user *uaddr)
>> +{
>> +int op = (encoded_op >> 28) & 7;
>> +int cmp = (encoded_op >> 24) & 15;
>> +int oparg = (encoded_op << 8) >> 20;
>> +int cmparg = (encoded_op <<
From: Anton Blanchard
I see a panic in early boot when building with a recent gcc toolchain.
The issue is a divide by zero, which is undefined. Older toolchains
let us get away with it:
int foo(int a) { return a / 0; }
foo:
li 9,0
divw 3,3,9
extsw 3,3
blr
But ne
On Sun, 2017-03-05 at 10:54 +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> From: Anton Blanchard
>
> I see a panic in early boot when building with a recent gcc
> toolchain.
> The issue is a divide by zero, which is undefined. Older toolchains
> let us get away with it:
Maybe we should panic though ... not hav
On Sun, 2017-03-05 at 11:25 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-03-05 at 10:54 +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> > From: Anton Blanchard
> >
> > I see a panic in early boot when building with a recent gcc
> > toolchain.
> > The issue is a divide by zero, which is undefined. Older to
On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 11:15:17AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 03/04/17 05:05, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> >>
> >> +static int futex_atomic_op_inuser(int encoded_op, u32 __user *uaddr)
> >> +{
> >> + int op = (encoded_op >> 28) & 7;
> >> + int cmp = (encoded_op >> 24) & 15;
> >> +
,Chris Metcalf ,Thomas Gleixner
,Ingo Molnar ,Chris Zankel
,Max Filippov ,Arnd Bergmann
,x...@kernel.org,linux-al...@vger.kernel.org,linux-snps-...@lists.infradead.org,linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org,linux-hexa...@vger.kernel.org,linux-i...@vger.kernel.org,linux-m...@linux-mips.org,openr...
,Chris Metcalf ,Thomas Gleixner
,Ingo Molnar ,Chris Zankel
,Max Filippov ,Arnd Bergmann
,x...@kernel.org,linux-al...@vger.kernel.org,linux-snps-...@lists.infradead.org,linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org,linux-hexa...@vger.kernel.org,linux-i...@vger.kernel.org,linux-m...@linux-mips.org,openr...
10 matches
Mail list logo