Joonsoo Kim writes:
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 02:23:59PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> Joonsoo Kim writes:
>>
>> > Now, we have general CMA reserved area management framework,
>> > so use it for future maintainabilty. There is no functional change.
>> >
>> > Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz
>>
Joonsoo Kim writes:
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 12:55:39PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> Joonsoo Kim writes:
>>
>> > Currently, there are two users on CMA functionality, one is the DMA
>> > subsystem and the other is the kvm on powerpc. They have their own code
>> > to manage CMA reserved are
Hello,
On 2014-06-16 07:40, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
Currently, there are two users on CMA functionality, one is the DMA
subsystem and the other is the KVM on powerpc. They have their own code
to manage CMA reserved area even if they looks really similar.
>From my guess, it is caused by some needs on
At Sun, 15 Jun 2014 13:37:55 -0700,
Joe Perches wrote:
>
> Use the zeroing function instead of dma_alloc_coherent & memset(,0,)
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches
Applied, thanks.
Takashi
> ---
> sound/aoa/soundbus/i2sbus/core.c | 12
> sound/sparc/dbri.c | 6 ++
Hi Linus !
This is a single revert for a patch I should have never merged in the
first place had I reviewed things with a clear mind at the time :-(
Cheers,
Ben.
The following changes since commit
7171511eaec5bf23fb06078f59784a3a0626b38f:
Linux 3.16-rc1 (2014-06-15 17:45:28 -1000)
are availa
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 08:08:07PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> @@ -1507,25 +1529,7 @@ static void sdhci_do_set_ios(struct sdhci_host *host,
> struct mmc_ios *ios)
> host->ops->set_clock(host, host->clock);
> }
>
> - if (host->ops->set_uhs_signalin
On 16 June 2014 12:46, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 08:08:07PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
>> @@ -1507,25 +1529,7 @@ static void sdhci_do_set_ios(struct sdhci_host *host,
>> struct mmc_ios *ios)
>> host->ops->set_clock(host, host->clock);
>>
On Friday, May 30, 2014 7:11 PM, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>
> This patchset makes get_brightness callback optional
> and removes trivial implementations.
> Driver changes are quite obvious so I have put them into single
> patch.
>
> The patchset is based on the current linux-next branch.
>
> Regards
On 16 June 2014 14:17, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 16 June 2014 12:46, Russell King - ARM Linux
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 08:08:07PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
>>> @@ -1507,25 +1529,7 @@ static void sdhci_do_set_ios(struct sdhci_host
>>> *host, struct mmc_ios *ios)
>>>
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Jingoo Han wrote:
> On Friday, May 30, 2014 7:11 PM, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> >
> > This patchset makes get_brightness callback optional
> > and removes trivial implementations.
> > Driver changes are quite obvious so I have put them into single
> > patch.
> >
> > The patchset
tty_wait_until_sent_from_close() drops the tty lock while waiting
for the tty driver to finish sending previously accepted data (ie.,
data remaining in its write buffer and transmit fifo).
However, dropping the tty lock is a hold-over from when the tty
lock was system-wide; ie., one lock for all t
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:11:35AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 2014-06-16 07:40, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> >Currently, there are two users on CMA functionality, one is the DMA
> >subsystem and the other is the KVM on powerpc. They have their own code
> >to manage CMA reserved area ev
On Fri, 13 Jun 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> If compiled with W=1, the following warning is seen in powerpc builds.
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c:750:18: warning:
> type qualifiers ignored on function return type
> static const int powerpc_smt_flags(void)
> ^
>
> This is ca
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 03:27:19PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi, Joonsoo
>
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 02:40:43PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > We should free memory for bitmap when we find zone mis-match,
> > otherwise this memory will leak.
> >
> > Additionally, I copy code comment from PPC KVM
On 06/16/2014 06:25 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jun 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:
If compiled with W=1, the following warning is seen in powerpc builds.
arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c:750:18: warning:
type qualifiers ignored on function return type
static const int powerpc_smt_flags(v
Hi Simon,
How about this patch?
Thanks
Wei
On 06/12/2014 01:16 PM, wei.y...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Yang Wei
The commit b02d735bf was to rearrange the device-tree entries, and
assumed that these entries are sorted in the ascending order. but
acctually when I was validating kexec and kdump,
ABIv2 has the concept of a global and local entry point to a function.
In most cases we are interested in the local entry point, and so that is
what ppc_function_entry() returns.
However we have a case in the ftrace code where we want the global entry
point, and there may be other places we need i
In commit 24a1bdc35, "Fix ABIv2 issues with __ftrace_make_call", Anton
changed the logic that creates and patches the branch, and added a
thinko in the check of create_branch(). create_branch() returns the
instruction that was generated, so if we get zero then it succeeded.
The result is we can't
In commit 24a1bdc35, "Fix ABIv2 issues with __ftrace_make_call", Anton
changed the logic that checks for the expected code sequence when
patching a module.
We missed the typo in the mask, 0x0 should be 0x, which
has the effect of making the test always true.
That makes it impossib
There is a bug in the handling of the function entry when we are nopping
out a branch from a module in ftrace.
We compare the result of module_trampoline_target() with the value of
ppc_function_entry(), and expect them to be true. But they never will
be.
module_trampoline_target() will always ret
The printks() in our ftrace code have no prefix, so they appear on the
console with very little context, eg:
Branch out of range
Use pr_fmt() & pr_err() to add a prefix. While we're at it, collapse a
few split lines that don't need to be, and add a missing newline to one
message.
Signed-off-by
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 02:18:21PM +0530, Mahesh J Salgaonkar wrote:
> From: Mahesh Salgaonkar
>
> Currently we forward MCEs to guest which have been recovered by guest.
> And for unhandled errors we do not deliver the MCE to guest. It looks like
> with no support of FWNMI in qemu, guest just pan
22 matches
Mail list logo
