On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
> JFYI, when comparing v3.14-rc3[1] to v3.14-rc2[3], the summaries are:
> - build errors: +17/-6
+ /scratch/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/include/asm/floppy.h: error:
'isa_bridge_pcidev' undeclared (first use in this function): =>
142:20
Hi,
I have just noticed that ppc has RECLAIM_DISTANCE reduced to 10 set by
56608209d34b (powerpc/numa: Set a smaller value for RECLAIM_DISTANCE to
enable zone reclaim). The commit message suggests that the zone reclaim
is desirable for all NUMA configurations.
History has shown that the zone recla
The following patch series is targetted at two things - fixing the SDIO
interrupt handling, and fixing problems with the sdhci driver.
- the first two patches from Thomas Gleixner provide genirq support to
allow us to fix the SDIO interrupt handling in a graceful manner.
- patch 3 adds support f
Signed-off-by: Russell King
=-DO NOT APPLY-=
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c | 2 ++
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-bcm-kona.c | 1 +
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-bcm2835.c | 1 +
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-cns3xxx.c | 1 +
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-dove.c | 1 +
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c |
Rather than having platform_reset_enter/platform_reset_exit methods,
turn the core of the reset handling into a library function which
platforms can call at the appropriate moment in their (new) reset
method.
Signed-off-by: Russell King
=-DO NOT APPLY-=
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c | 2 ++
Signed-off-by: Russell King
=-DO NOT APPLY-=
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c | 2 ++
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-bcm-kona.c | 1 +
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-bcm2835.c | 1 +
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-cns3xxx.c | 3 +--
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-dove.c | 1 +
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc.h
Add sdhci_set_uhs_signaling() and always call the set_uhs_signaling
method. This avoids quirks being added into sdhci_set_uhs_signaling().
Signed-off-by: Russell King
=-DO NOT APPLY-=
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c | 2 ++
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-bcm-kona.c | 1 +
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-b
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 04:16:11PM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > Here is another patch with some fixes. The additional logic is only
> > compiled in if CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES is set.
> >
> > Subject: slub: Memoryless node support
> >
> > Suppor
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:51:37PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > Hi Joonsoo,
> > Also, given that only ia64 and (hopefuly soon) ppc64 can set
> > CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES, does that mean x86_64 can't have
> > memoryless nodes present? Even with
On 12.02.2014 [16:16:11 -0600], Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Here is another patch with some fixes. The additional logic is only
> compiled in if CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES is set.
>
> Subject: slub: Memoryless node support
>
> Support memoryless nodes by tracking which allocations are failing.
>
On 18.02.2014 [10:57:09 -0600], Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:51:37PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > > Hi Joonsoo,
> > > Also, given that only ia64 and (hopefuly soon) ppc64 can set
> > > CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES, doe
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
>
> Well, on powerpc, with the hypervisor providing the resources and the
> topology, you can have cpuless and memoryless nodes. I'm not sure how
> "fake" the NUMA is -- as I think since the resources are virtualized to
> be one system, it's logicall
On 18.02.2014 [13:58:20 -0600], Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2014, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
>
> >
> > Well, on powerpc, with the hypervisor providing the resources and the
> > topology, you can have cpuless and memoryless nodes. I'm not sure how
> > "fake" the NUMA is -- as I think
I am enable to get one keyboard sequence responded to with the noted change
in the dts .
for instance:
SysRQ ( Break) c
Panics .. Which is a good response, and since it doesn't require a return
to user mode ( I suspect ) it appears to work.
Any other requests fail to report any informa
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> We use the topology provided by the hypervisor, it does actually reflect
> where CPUs and memory are, and their corresponding performance/NUMA
> characteristics.
And so there are actually nodes without memory that have processors?
Can the hypervis
On 18.02.2014 [15:49:22 -0600], Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2014, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
>
> > We use the topology provided by the hypervisor, it does actually reflect
> > where CPUs and memory are, and their corresponding performance/NUMA
> > characteristics.
>
> And so there a
On 02/16/2014 04:22 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-01-31 at 15:58 -0800, Tyrel Datwyler wrote:
>> Traditionally it has been drmgr's responsibilty to update the device tree
>> through the /proc/ppc64/ofdt interface after a suspend/resume operation.
>> This patchset however has modi
Hi Michal,
On 18.02.2014 [10:06:58 +0100], Michal Hocko wrote:
> Hi,
> I have just noticed that ppc has RECLAIM_DISTANCE reduced to 10 set by
> 56608209d34b (powerpc/numa: Set a smaller value for RECLAIM_DISTANCE to
> enable zone reclaim). The commit message suggests that the zone reclaim
> is des
On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 15:28 -0800, Tyrel Datwyler wrote:
> In this case we get a double update which I clearly neglected to
> mention
> in the patch. The first patch in this series actually removes an
> unnecessary double update from the existing kernel implementation. The
> same information is ret
On 18.02.2014 [15:34:05 -0800], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On 18.02.2014 [10:06:58 +0100], Michal Hocko wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have just noticed that ppc has RECLAIM_DISTANCE reduced to 10 set by
> > 56608209d34b (powerpc/numa: Set a smaller value for RECLAIM_DISTANCE to
> > enable
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 12:59 +0530, Harninder Rai wrote:
> Missing bindings were found on running checkpatch.pl on bsc9132
> device tree. This patch add/update the following
>
> - Add bindings for L2 cache controller
> - Add bindings for memory controller
> - Update bindings for USB controller
>
>
On 18.02.2014 [15:58:00 -0800], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On 18.02.2014 [15:34:05 -0800], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > Hi Michal,
> >
> > On 18.02.2014 [10:06:58 +0100], Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I have just noticed that ppc has RECLAIM_DISTANCE reduced to 10 set by
> > > 56608209d3
22 matches
Mail list logo
