P1010rdb-pa and p1010rdb-pb have different mtd of nand.
So update dts to adapt to both p1010rdb-pa and p1010rdb-pb.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Qiang
---
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1010rdb-pa.dts | 40 +++
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1010rdb-pa_36b.dts | 40 +++
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 06:21:12PM -0500, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 11:04 +0200, Hendrik Brueckner wrote:
> > Indeed, two callbacks change the DTR line. The main difference is that
> > tiocmget/tiocmset can be called from user space by ioctl. That's not the
> > case
>
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 06:57:53PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> do you plan to send this patch upstream anytime soon ?
It'll go next time I send stuff if it hasn't already.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Li
Hi,
Xiubo Li wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-pcm-dma.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-pcm-dma.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..c4d925e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-pcm-dma.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
[...]
> +
> +static int fsl_sai_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 05:01:14PM +0800, Xiubo Li wrote:
> When the CONFIG_REGULATOR is disabled there will be some warnings
> printed out.
A little confused by the title. But after looking at the comments,
is the patch just gonna add some debug info for the case when the
CONFIG_REGULATOR's
Hi,
Xiubo Li wrote:
> When the CONFIG_REGULATOR is disabled there will be some warnings
> printed out.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li
> ---
> sound/soc/codecs/sgtl5000.c | 13 -
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/sgtl5000.c b/sound/soc
We implemented the optimized branch selection in higher levels of api.
That made static_keys very unintuitive, so this patch introduces another
element to jump_table, carrying one bit that tells the underlying code
which branch to optimize.
It is now possible to select optimized branch for every j
Hi,
Xiubo Li wrote:
The subject has a wrong name for the codec "SGT1..." instead of
"SGTL...", which will make it difficult to search for this thread in
mail archives or in commit messages once this patches should be applied!
Lothar Waßmann
--
_
On 10/16/2013 11:53 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Commit e82b89a6f19bae73fb064d1b3dd91fcefbb478f4 introduces a trivial
> local denial of service.
>
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c
>> @@ -1351,11 +1351,15 @@ static ssize_t modalias_show(struct devi
>> const
Commit e82b89a6f19bae73fb064d1b3dd91fcefbb478f4 used strcat instead of
strcpy which can result in an overflow of newlines on the buffer.
Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava
Cc: b...@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: b...@decadent.org.uk
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c |4 ++--
1 fil
Xiubo Li wrote:
+ res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
+ sai->base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
Why not use of_iomap()?
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/list
This issue was causing the QEMU emulated USB device to fail dring
PCI probe.
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard
---
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c
b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c
index 4368ec6..ac0b034 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/ke
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard
---
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
index 0307901..f253361 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@
static void tce_inva
> Commit e82b89a6f19bae73fb064d1b3dd91fcefbb478f4 used strcat instead of
> strcpy which can result in an overflow of newlines on the buffer.
...
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c
> @@ -1531,12 +1531,12 @@ static ssize_t modalias_show(struct device *dev,
> struct d
On 10/17/2013 08:22 AM, David Laight wrote:
>> Commit e82b89a6f19bae73fb064d1b3dd91fcefbb478f4 used strcat instead of
>> strcpy which can result in an overflow of newlines on the buffer.
> ...
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c
>> @@ -1531,12 +1531,12 @@ static
On 10/17/2013 02:15 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Xiubo Li wrote:
>> +res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>> +sai->base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
>
> Why not use of_iomap()?
Because it won't check for conflicting resource regions.
- Lars
_
Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>>+res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>>+sai->base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
>
>Why not use of_iomap()?
Because it won't check for conflicting resource regions.
Maybe I've been out of the loop for too long, but why is that a
On 10/17/2013 03:22 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>>+res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>>+sai->base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
>>> >
>>> >Why not use of_iomap()?
>> Because it won't check for conflicting resource regions.
>
>
OK. I will do.
-Chenhui
From: Wood Scott-B07421
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 7:20
To: Zhao Chenhui-B35336
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [4/4] powerpc/mpc8548: Add workaround for erratum NMG_SRIO135
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 05:10:56PM
Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>Maybe I've been out of the loop for too long, but why is that a particular
>problem with this driver?
It is usually something you'd want to check in general to make sure that you
don't have multiple device that access the same iomem region at the same time.
I under
Hi Joerg,
Please consider these patches for 3.12.
Regards
Varun
> -Original Message-
> From: Sethi Varun-B16395
> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 4:53 PM
> To: j...@8bytes.org; io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; linuxppc-
> d...@lists.ozlabs.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Yoder Stuar
On 10/17/2013 03:37 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>>> >Maybe I've been out of the loop for too long, but why is that a particular
>>> >problem with this driver?
>
>> It is usually something you'd want to check in general to make sure that you
>> don't have multiple device that
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 03:51:54PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 10/17/2013 03:37 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> > I understand that, but I'm trying to figure out why of_iomap() is okay for
> > hundreds of other drivers, but not this one. I've used it dozens of times
> > myself, without ever wor
On 06/06/2013 08:24 PM, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 08:39:45AM -0400, Robert Knight wrote:
On 06/06/2013 07:32 AM, Brian King wrote:
On 06/05/2013 04:14 PM, Robert Knight wrote:
On 6/3/2013 11:52 PM, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 01:16:52PM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 21:08 -0500, Tang Yuantian-B29983 wrote:
> > > > That shows the dividers as being somewhere in between the PLL and the
> > MUX.
> > > > The MUX is where the divider is selected. There's nothing in the
> > > > PLL's programming interface that relates to the dividers. As such
On 07.10.2013, at 18:47, Aneesh Kumar K.V
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This patch series support enabling HV and PR KVM together in the same kernel.
> We
> extend machine property with new property "kvm_type". A value of "HV" will
> force HV
> KVM and "PR" PR KVM. If we don't specify kvm_type we wil
On 07.10.2013, at 18:47, Aneesh Kumar K.V
wrote:
> From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V"
>
> Make required changes to get BOOKE configs to build with
> the introduction of kvmppc_ops callback
>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V
This can not be a separate commit, as you're breaking bisectability for boo
On Thu, 2013-10-17 at 00:51 -0500, Wang Dongsheng-B40534 wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
> > Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 11:20 AM
> > To: Wang Dongsheng-B40534; Wood Scott-B07421
> > Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 4/4] powe
|
| How about I add this to the function header ?
|
| * Please use the table in Appendix F (opcode maps) to determine
| * events selected by this function.
Here is the updated patch with the comment.
---
>From 38d1f9ac67a7f50db593e5875a8de6a2ecbea8e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sukadev Bha
On 10/17/2013 11:01 AM, Xiubo Li wrote:
[...]
> +static int fsl_sai_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
> + struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params,
> + struct snd_soc_dai *cpu_dai)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = fsl_sai_hw_params_tr(substream, params, cpu_dai,
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 12:10:28 +0200
Radim Krčmář wrote:
> We implemented the optimized branch selection in higher levels of api.
> That made static_keys very unintuitive, so this patch introduces another
> element to jump_table, carrying one bit that tells the underlying code
> which branch to opt
> On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 21:08 -0500, Tang Yuantian-B29983 wrote:
> > > > > That shows the dividers as being somewhere in between the PLL
> > > > > and the
> > > MUX.
> > > > > The MUX is where the divider is selected. There's nothing in
> > > > > the PLL's programming interface that relates to the
> -Original Message-
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 12:52 AM
> To: Wang Dongsheng-B40534
> Cc: Bhushan Bharat-R65777; Wood Scott-B07421; linuxppc-
> d...@lists.ozlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] powerpc/85xx: add sysfs for pw20 state and
> altivec idle
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
> Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 2:46 PM
> To: Wang Dongsheng-B40534; Wood Scott-B07421
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 4/4] powerpc/85xx: add sysfs for pw20 state and
> altivec idle
>
>
>
> > > > -Or
Alexander Graf writes:
> On 07.10.2013, at 18:47, Aneesh Kumar K.V
> wrote:
>
>> From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V"
>>
>> Make required changes to get BOOKE configs to build with
>> the introduction of kvmppc_ops callback
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V
>
> This can not be a separate commit, as
35 matches
Mail list logo
