On 06/09/13 14:44, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2013, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
>
>> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
>>
>> Now that the cpu device registration initialises the of_node(if available)
>> appropriately for all the cpus, parsing here is redundant.
>>
>> This pa
On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 15:29 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Are we guaranteed that Sapphire will keep the stack pointer positive
> at all times? (More a question for Ben H than you.)
Good point, we *might* eventually set the top bit..
Ben.
___
Linuxpp
On Thu, 05 Sep 2013 16:50:48 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
...
> Thanks. BTW. Next time, any chance you can base this off the same point
> in Linus tree where my next branch is based ? Or base of my next
> branch :-)
Okay, I will base of your next branch.
Thanks,
Anatolij
___
In both B4 and T4240QDS platform PCA9547 I2C bus multiplexer is used.
The sub-nodes are also reorganized according to right I2C topology.
Signed-off-by: Jia Hongtao
---
V3 change log:
* Change "channel" to "i2c" based on i2c-mux binding.
* Update vendor from philips to nxp.
V2 change log:
* Reor
On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 08:35 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 10:13:00AM -0500, Tom Musta wrote:
> > To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> > Subject: [PATCH] powerpc: OE=1 Form Instructions Not Decoded Correctly
> > From: Tom Musta
> >
> > PowerISA uses instruction bit 21 to in
On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 08:35 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
>
> Also, you need to indent your code correctly according to
> Documentation/CodingStyle.
Looks like the patch has been mangled by the mailer ... it's in HTML to
begin with :-)
Tom, you need to find a mailer setup that works for sending p
Hi Sudeep,
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 10:24:39AM +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
> Hi Shawn,
>
> Can you please clarify ? The fix would be as below but I would like to
> know if setting cpu_dev to get_cpu_device(0) instead of &pdev->dev has
> any impact on other parts of code using cpu_dev ?
I'
On 09/09/13 15:32, Shawn Guo wrote:
> Hi Sudeep,
>
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 10:24:39AM +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
>> Hi Shawn,
>>
>> Can you please clarify ? The fix would be as below but I would like to
>> know if setting cpu_dev to get_cpu_device(0) instead of &pdev->dev has
>> any imp
Hi,
i`m working on the embedded hypervisor targeting QorIQ platforms (p3041/p4080).
I have working prototype starting custom RTOS on just single core in the guest
space. What I see is the big latency (up to 3 times more) in RTOS running atop
of HV comparing to RTOS running bare-metal. I`m using lm
> Looks like the patch has been mangled by the mailer ... it's in HTML to
> begin with :-)
Frustrating. I did use a plain text option on the mail client and did a
test send to a few accounts before posting to the mailing list. The
patch was verified by checkpatch.pl before it got mangled.
I w
> > Isn't that code occasionally used with uprobes too nowadays ?
>
> Yes. I believe so.
I'm going to back-pedal a little. I reread code and can connect
single step code to kprobes but not necessarily to uprobes. So
I am not sure that this code is used with uprobes.
On 09/08/2013 5:28 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Hi all,
powerpc allmodconfig build on the latest upstream kernel results in:
ERROR: ".cpu_to_chip_id" [drivers/block/mtip32xx/mtip32xx.ko] undefined!
This is due to commit 15863ff3b (powerpc: Make chip-id information
available to userspace).
Not su
Hi Tom,
On Mon, 9 Sep 2013 07:44:54 -0500 Tom Musta wrote:
>
> > Looks like the patch has been mangled by the mailer ... it's in HTML to
> > begin with :-)
>
> Frustrating. I did use a plain text option on the mail client and did a
> test send to a few accounts before posting to the mailing lis
On 09/09/2013 04:55 PM, Asai Thambi S P wrote:
On 09/08/2013 5:28 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Hi all,
powerpc allmodconfig build on the latest upstream kernel results in:
ERROR: ".cpu_to_chip_id" [drivers/block/mtip32xx/mtip32xx.ko] undefined!
This is due to commit 15863ff3b (powerpc: Make chip-
powerpc allmodconfig build fails with:
ERROR: ".cpu_to_chip_id" [drivers/block/mtip32xx/mtip32xx.ko] undefined!
The problem was introduced with commit 15863ff3b (powerpc: Make chip-id
information available to userspace).
Export the missing symbol.
Cc: Vasant Hegde
Cc: Shivaprasad G Bhat
Signe
On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 09:54 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> This patchset is the re-spin of the original branch stack sampling
> patchset which introduced new PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND filter. This patchset
> also enables SW based branch filtering support for PPC64 platforms which have
> bran
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 04:24:18PM +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
> Hi Shawn,
>
> Ok. But I am bit suspicious about devm_clk_get(cpu_dev, NULL).
> I don't understand completely as how the clock are registered(whether
> with dev_id or with connection_id).
As the connection_id of devm_clk_get(
On 09/10/2013 07:36 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 09:54 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> This patchset is the re-spin of the original branch stack sampling
>> patchset which introduced new PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND filter. This patchset
>> also enables SW based branch fil
Update phy node according to new P1010RDB-PB board.
Signed-off-by: Shengzhou Liu
Signed-off-by: Zhao Qiang
---
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1010rdb.dtsi | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1010rdb.dtsi
b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1010rdb.dtsi
i
Mark? ping.
On 09/03/2013 05:01 PM, Hongbo Zhang wrote:
On 09/02/2013 11:58 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:26:19PM +0100, hongbo.zh...@freescale.com
wrote:
From: Hongbo Zhang
Freescale QorIQ T4 and B4 introduce new 8-channel DMA engines, this
patch adds
the device
20 matches
Mail list logo
