On Mon 28-01-13 09:33:49, Tang Chen wrote:
> On 01/25/2013 09:17 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >On Wed 23-01-13 06:29:31, Simon Jeons wrote:
> >>On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 19:42 +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
> >>>Here are some bug fix patches for physical memory hot-remove. All these
> >>>patches are based on the
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat
wrote:
> Once stop_machine() is gone from the CPU offline path, we won't be able to
> depend on preempt_disable() or local_irq_disable() to prevent CPUs from
> going offline from under us.
>
> Use the get/put_online_cpus_atomic() APIs to prevent CP
Hello, Bob.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Bob Liu wrote:
> Thanks, will be applied to my blackfin arch tree.
I think we still have some work ahead of us to have this patchset
ready for inclusion and even then it probably would be best to route
these patches together, so probably not a very go
Felipe Balbi writes:
> By simply setting a flag, we can drop some
> boilerplate code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi
> ---
> drivers/usb/gadget/pxa27x_udc.c | 9 +
Acked-by: Robert Jarzmik
And I tested also your patch and it works in my environment. For next patches
I'd like to be CCe
Hi Linus !
Whenever you have a chance between two dives, you might want to consider
pulling my merge branch to pickup a few fixes for 3.8 that have been
accumulating for the last couple of weeks (I was myself travelling
then on vacation). Nothing major, just a handful of powerpc bug fixes
that I c
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
>
> Whenever you have a chance between two dives, you might want to consider
> pulling my merge branch to pickup a few fixes for 3.8 that have been
> accumulating for the last couple of weeks (I was myself travelling
> then on vacation
On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 16:03 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I'll have you know that I haven't quite even left for Au yet, and I
> have LCA before diving. So no snarky "in between dives" comments,
> please.
It wasn't meant to be "snarky", sorry about that...
> At least not for a few days.
>
> >
On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 17:33 -0200, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
> ---
> v2:
> Remove the unneeded extra variable i, which caused build failure.
I believe something equivalent is already in -next, can you dbl check ?
Cheers,
Ben.
> ---
> ar
On 01/29/2013 06:06 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Bob.
>
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Bob Liu wrote:
>> Thanks, will be applied to my blackfin arch tree.
>
> I think we still have some work ahead of us to have this patchset
> ready for inclusion and even then it probably would be best to r
The parameter is unused, and complicates a following fix. Just remove
it.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
index b4bb9e1..a8e99f9 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
+++ b/arch/pow
pseries/iommu: remove DDW on kexec
We currently insert a property in the device-tree when we successfully
configure DDW for a given slot. This was meant to be an optimization to
speed up kexec/kdump, so that we don't need to make the RTAS calls again
to re-configured DDW in the new kernel.
Hugetlbfs is missed in current p1023rds_defconfig, enable it by default.
Signed-off-by: Shaohui Xie
---
arch/powerpc/configs/85xx/p1023rds_defconfig |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/configs/85xx/p1023rds_defconfig
b/arch/powerpc/configs/85xx
12 matches
Mail list logo