On 05.08.2012, at 11:52, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall
>
> Convert a 0 error return code to a negative one, as returned elsewhere in the
> function.
>
> A new label is also added to avoid freeing things that are known to not yet
> be allocated.
>
> A simplified version of the seman
On 10/01/2012 11:03 AM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
Hi Chen,
2012/09/29 11:15, Ni zhan Chen wrote:
On 09/05/2012 05:25 PM, we...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu
The function get_page_bootmem() may be called more than one time to
the same
page. There is no need to set page's type,
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Ni zhan Chen wrote:
> On 09/05/2012 05:25 PM, we...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
>>
>> From: Wen Congyang
>>
>> The function acpi_bus_remove() can remove a acpi device from acpi device.
>
> IIUC, s/acpi device/acpi bus
IIUC, acpi_bus_remove() mean "remove the device from
>> Then, you introduced bisect breakage. It is definitely unacceptable.
>
> What is "bisect breakage" meaning?
Think what's happen when only applying path [1/21].
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listin
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> JFYI, when comparing v3.6 to v3.6-rc7[3], the summaries are:
> - build errors: +4/-1
+ arch/powerpc/platforms/512x/mpc512x_shared.c: error:
'FSL_DIU_PORT_DVI' undeclared (first use in this function): => 189:9
+ arch/powerpc/platfo
Hi Ben,
On 02.10.2012 [10:58:29 +1000], Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 16:03 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> > Phew. Here we go :). It looks to be more of a PPC specific problem
> > than it appeared as at first:
>
> Ok, so I suspect the problem is the pushing down of the loc
On 02.10.2012, at 23:43, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On 02.10.2012 [10:58:29 +1000], Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>> On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 16:03 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> Phew. Here we go :). It looks to be more of a PPC specific problem
>>> than it appeared as at first:
>>
On 02.10.2012 [23:47:39 +0200], Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 02.10.2012, at 23:43, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
>
> > Hi Ben,
> >
> > On 02.10.2012 [10:58:29 +1000], Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 16:03 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>> Phew. Here we go :). It looks to b
On 03.10.2012, at 00:17, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On 02.10.2012 [23:47:39 +0200], Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 02.10.2012, at 23:43, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Ben,
>>>
>>> On 02.10.2012 [10:58:29 +1000], Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 16:03 +0200, Ale
Don't use 47x only #defines for TLBIVAX or ICBT, supply and use helpers
in ppc-opcode.h
This fixes a compile breakage.
Signed-off-by: Tony Breeds
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h |4
arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_nohash_low.S | 15 ---
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
Since the "Disintegrate asm/system.h for PowerPC"
(ae3a197e3d0bfe3f4bf1693723e82dc018c096f3) This has been failing when
DEBUG is #defined.
Signed-off-by: Tony Breeds
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
This set of patches moves some OF code that has been living
in the pseries tree over to the generic OF code base. The
functionality being migrated over is something that, I believe,
should live in the generic code base. The specific functionality
being migrated to generic OF code is;
o Updating th
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> xtensa-allmodconfig (hmm, this is not a new one, it felt through the
> cracks in -rc7 because of log line interleaving).
>
> Ugh, arch/xtensa/include/asm/regs.h defines way to generic symbols,
> like "MISC" (which causes the above breakage), and even a few
> 2-letter sy
When adding or removing a device tree node we should also update
the device tree in /proc/device-tree. This action is already done in the
generic OF code for adding/removing properties of a node. This patch adds
this functionality for nodes.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot
---
arch/powerpc/platf
This patch moves the definition of the of_drconf_cell struct to asm/prom.h
to make it available for all powerpc/pseries code.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/prom.h | 16
arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c | 12
2 files changed, 16 ins
This patch moves the notification chain for updates to the device tree
from the powerpc/pseries code to the base OF code. This makes this
functionality available to all architectures.
Additionally the notification chain is updated to allow notifications
for property add/remove/update. To make this
Rename the prom_*_property routines of the generic OF code to of_*_property.
This brings them in line with the naming used by the rest of the OF code.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c | 12 ++--
arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c|
Remove the pSeries_reconfig.h header file. At this point there is only one
definition in the file, pSeries_coalesce_init(), which can be
moved to rtas.h.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/pSeries_reconfig.h | 15 ---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/rtas.h
On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 14:43 -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
>
> Started looking into this. If your suspicion were accurate, wouldn't
> the
> bisection have stopped at 0e4bc95d87394364f408627067238453830bdbf3
> ("powerpc/iommu: Reduce spinlock coverage in iommu_alloc and
> iommu_free")?
>
> Alex
19 matches
Mail list logo
