Hi,
I got such build errors in powerpc allyesconfig and other configs.
How can they be eliminated? I'm running the cross compile tools from
kernel.org.
drivers/built-in.o: In function `.yenta_interrupt':
yenta_socket.c:(.text+0x1ffba78): relocation truncated to fit: R_PPC64_REL24
against symbol
On Sep 27, 2012, at 4:51 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 09/27/2012 04:45:08 PM, Gala Kumar-B11780 wrote:
>> On Sep 27, 2012, at 11:09 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>> On 09/27/2012 02:02:03 PM, Chunhe Lan wrote:
Original process of call:
The mpc85xx_pci_err_probe function completes to been regi
Hi Kumar,
>
>It was, can you figure out in u-boot what exact config read on
the bus would return the correct thing.
>
>The fact that when we probe the
device at 0001:03 we should get back something like cfg_data=0xabba1b65
>
here
follow some details about what is going on inside u-boot; verbos
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 04:19:55AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 28.09.2012, at 04:04, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>
> >> Below are OOPS excerpts from different rc's I tried. All of them crashed -
> >> all the way up to current Li
On 28.09.2012, at 17:10, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 04:19:55AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 28.09.2012, at 04:04, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Below are OOPS excerpts from different rc's I tried. A
On 09/27/2012 05:33:26 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Sep 27, 2012, at 4:51 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 09/27/2012 04:45:08 PM, Gala Kumar-B11780 wrote:
>> On Sep 27, 2012, at 11:09 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>> On 09/27/2012 02:02:03 PM, Chunhe Lan wrote:
Original process of call:
The mp
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 15:55 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 22:42 -0700, Haren Myneni wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Michael. Yes, we noticed 6% overhead with null syscall test.
> > Hence added cmdline option as suggested. I will add this comment in
> > the
> > changelog.
> >
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu
wrote:
> Hi Chen,
>
>
> 2012/09/28 11:22, Ni zhan Chen wrote:
>>
>> On 09/05/2012 05:25 PM, we...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu
>>>
>>> remove_memory() only try to offline pages. It is called in two cases:
>>> 1. hot remo
On 09/05/2012 05:25 PM, we...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu
The function get_page_bootmem() may be called more than one time to the same
page. There is no need to set page's type, private if the function is not
the first time called to the page.
Note: the patch is just optimiza
On 09/28/2012 01:35 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/27/2012 05:33:26 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Sep 27, 2012, at 4:51 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 09/27/2012 04:45:08 PM, Gala Kumar-B11780 wrote:
>> On Sep 27, 2012, at 11:09 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>> On 09/27/2012 02:02:03 PM, Chunhe Lan wrote:
O
On 09/05/2012 05:25 PM, we...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
From: Wen Congyang
This patch series aims to support physical memory hot-remove.
The patches can free/remove the following things:
- acpi_memory_info : [RFC PATCH 4/19]
- /sys/firmware/memmap/X/{end, start, typ
11 matches
Mail list logo
