On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 06:08:05 +0300, Liu Qiang-B32616
wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Geanta Neag Horia Ioan-B05471
> > Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 10:23 PM
> > To: Liu Qiang-B32616; linux-cry...@vger.kernel.org;
> > dan.j.willi...@gmail.com; herb...@gondor.hengli.com.au;
> > da
> -Original Message-
> From: Geanta Neag Horia Ioan-B05471
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 6:39 PM
> To: Liu Qiang-B32616; linux-cry...@vger.kernel.org;
> dan.j.willi...@gmail.com; herb...@gondor.hengli.com.au;
> da...@davemloft.net; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-
> d...@lists.ozla
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 18:00:07 +0800
we...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
> This patch series aims to support physical memory hot-remove.
Have you had much review and testing feedback yet?
> The patches can free/remove the following things:
>
> - acpi_memory_info : [RFC PATCH 4/
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 18:00:11 +0800
we...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
> +int remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
> +{
> + int ret = -EBUSY;
> + lock_memory_hotplug();
> + /*
> + * The memory might become online by other task, even if you offine it.
> + * So we check whether
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 18:00:15 +0800
we...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
> From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu
>
> When (hot)adding memory into system, /sys/firmware/memmap/X/{end, start, type}
> sysfs files are created. But there is no code to remove these files. The patch
> implements the function to remove them.
>
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 18:00:20 +0800
we...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
> From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu
>
> There is a possibility that get_page_bootmem() is called to the same page many
> times. So when get_page_bootmem is called to the same page, the function only
> increments page->_count.
I really don't u
