On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 02:02:22AM +0200, Christoph Fritz wrote:
>
> Hi to All,
>
> after a while of testing and searching I can come up with a patch
> that fixes g_ether <-> iperf for fsl_udc on ARM i.MX35.
>
> The sad part is that this kind of fix is already implemented for
> marvell mv_udc dr
On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 07:58 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >
> > Having the timeout and retries in this function is the wrong thing to do.
> > We'll resubmit this without the loop and the caller will be responsible for
> > retrying the operations.
> >
> > I would rather have the caller ced
On 2012年05月11日 10:12, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> So we have another case of paca->irq_happened getting out of
> sync with the HW irq state. This can happen when a perfmon
> interrupt occurs while soft disabled, as it will return to a
> soft disabled but hard enabled context while leaving a sta
On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 14:13 +0530, K.Prasad wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT
> + int ret, len = 0;
> + struct thread_struct *thread = &(child->thread);
> + struct perf_event *bp;
> + struct perf_event_attr attr;
> +#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT */
"ret" is unused i
> > See here:
> > daec765da767e4a6a30e1298862b28f2cae9a73f
> > usb: gadget: mv_udc: fix dtd dma confusion
> >
> > So hereby I'm CC-ing all *udc.c maintainers to point out that this
> > issue maybe affects you too.
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Subject: [PATCH] usb: gadget: fsl_udc: fix dtd dma confusio
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 12:51:26AM +0200, Christoph Fritz wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 02:02:22AM +0200, Christoph Fritz wrote:
> >
> > Hi to All,
> >
> > after a while of testing and searching I can come up with a patch
> > that fixes g_ether <-> iperf for fsl_udc on ARM i.MX35.
> >
> > The
